Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Glassfish VS Mako Server

Compare Glassfish VS Mako Server and see what are their differences

Glassfish logo Glassfish

GlassFish v3, built by the GlassFish community, is the first compatible implementation of the Java...

Mako Server logo Mako Server

The Mako Server is an application server with an API that loosely resembles the Java Servlet API...
  • Glassfish Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-26
  • Mako Server Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-01

Glassfish features and specs

  • Open Source
    GlassFish is open-source, allowing developers to access and modify its source code. This promotes collaboration and continuous improvement by the community.
  • Enterprise Features
    It offers a range of enterprise-level features such as EJB, JPA, JMS, and web services, making it suitable for building complex applications.
  • Java EE Reference Implementation
    GlassFish is the reference implementation of Jakarta EE (formerly Java EE), ensuring adherence to standards and compatibility with other Java EE technologies.
  • Modular Architecture
    Using OSGi modules, GlassFish allows for a high degree of customization and the ability to deploy only necessary components, enhancing performance.
  • Admin Console
    It features an intuitive and user-friendly administrative console, simplifying the management of server instances and deployed applications.

Possible disadvantages of Glassfish

  • Performance Overhead
    Compared to other application servers, GlassFish might encounter performance issues under heavy load due to its extensive feature set.
  • Complex Configuration
    Configuring GlassFish can be complex and time-consuming, especially for beginners, due to its numerous configurable options.
  • Lower Adoption Rate
    It has a smaller user base compared to other application servers like Apache Tomcat or WildFly, potentially leading to less community support.
  • Limited Commercial Support
    While there is commercial support available, it is limited compared to other leading application servers, which might deter enterprise users seeking robust support options.
  • Resource Intensive
    GlassFish can be resource-intensive, requiring significant memory and processing power, which may not be ideal for smaller deployments.

Mako Server features and specs

  • Lightweight and Fast
    Mako Server is designed to be lightweight, allowing for high-speed performance with a small memory footprint, making it ideal for resource-constrained environments.
  • Embedded Web Server
    It can be easily embedded into other applications and devices, which is especially useful for IoT applications and solutions requiring embedded web servers.
  • Asynchronous I/O
    Supports asynchronous I/O, which can handle thousands of simultaneous connections efficiently, improving server scalability and responsiveness.
  • Lua Scripting
    Utilizes Lua scripting language for server-side scripting, enabling rapid development and offering flexibility in creating dynamic web applications.
  • Cross-Platform
    Mako Server is cross-platform, supporting various operating systems including Windows, macOS, and Linux, which increases its versatility.

Possible disadvantages of Mako Server

  • Learning Curve with Lua
    Developers unfamiliar with Lua will face a learning curve as they adapt to its syntax and capabilities, which could slow initial development.
  • Limited Community Support
    Compared to more widespread web servers like Apache or Nginx, Mako Server has a smaller community, which may result in fewer online resources and community support.
  • Not Designed for Large-Scale Applications
    Mako Server is tailored for embedded and IoT devices, which might not meet the requirements needed to handle very large-scale web applications.
  • Feature Set
    It has a more limited set of built-in features compared to other comprehensive web servers, potentially requiring additional configuration or development for complex needs.
  • Commercial Licensing
    While Mako Server offers a free version, certain features and commercial usage may require a paid license, which could be a consideration for cost-sensitive projects.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Glassfish and Mako Server)
Web And Application Servers
Application Server
65 65%
35% 35
Web Servers
58 58%
42% 42
Java
64 64%
36% 36

User comments

Share your experience with using Glassfish and Mako Server. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Glassfish and Mako Server

Glassfish Reviews

4 Open Source Application Servers (Comparison and Review)
There is no cost associated with downloading Glassfish software. There is product documentation available online. In addition, there are a number of resources available including forums and a product wiki.
Source: shadow-soft.com
Top 10 Open Source Java and JavaEE Application Servers
GlassFish is often considered as the reference implementation of Java EE and so supports Enterprise JavaBeans (a managed, server-side component architecture for modular construction of enterprise applications), JPA (Java Persistence API ), JavaServer Faces, JMS (Java Message Service), RMI (Java Remote Method Invocation), JavaServer Pages, servlets and more. Glassfish allows...

Mako Server Reviews

We have no reviews of Mako Server yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Mako Server seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Glassfish mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Glassfish yet. Tracking of Glassfish recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Mako Server mentions (2)

  • Lua: The Little Language That Could
    For anyone looking for a HTTP server, or a Lua runtime with batteries included, have a look at the Mako Server[1]. It's really wonderful to work with. I've automated my house based on it. It includes everything you may need , from JSON to TLS, email to websockets... All in a tiny 3MB binary, including the Lua interpreter!! I run it on a Raspberry Pi and the process takes around 3MB of RAM. Just unbelievable... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Expand your Consulting Skills and Learn Web Development for Microcontrollers
    The Barracuda App Server is like a Swiss army knife since it can be tailored for many different purposes, including embedded web development . The IDE you compile and upload to the ESP32 is called the LSP Application Manager , which includes an IDE that lets full stack developers create server side business logic in the Lua Scripting language. Check out the online interactive LSP and Lua Tutorial for a quick... - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Glassfish and Mako Server, you can also consider the following products

Payara Server - Payara Server is a fully supported, developer-friendly, open source application server. Innovative, cloud-native, optimized for production deployments. Jakarta EE & MicroProfile compatible.

JBoss - JBoss is Red Hats Java EE 5-compliant (soon Java EE 6-compliant) application server.

Apache Tomcat - An open source software implementation of the Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages technologies

Eclipse Jetty - Jetty is a highly scalable modular servlet engine and http server that natively supports many modern protocols like SPDY and WebSockets.

Oracle WebLogic - Receive a complimentary technical review and consultation on moving your Oracle WebLogic Server applications into containers.

Resin - Resin is a modern and secure web and Java Application server developed under Caucho Technology.