Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

GlusterFS VS Canonical

Compare GlusterFS VS Canonical and see what are their differences

ICT CLOUD
ICT CLOUD EMEA's Global Award-Winning Cloud Service Provider featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

GlusterFS logo GlusterFS

GlusterFS is a scale-out network-attached storage file system.

Canonical logo Canonical

Canonical is the leading managed private cloud provider. We will build, support and manage your Ubuntu Kubernetes private cloud for only $5-15 per server per day.
  • GlusterFS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-03-10
  • Canonical Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-19

GlusterFS videos

+ Add

An Overview of GlusterFS Architecture Part 2 - Non-replicated Cluster

Canonical videos

+ Add

Ubuntu and Canonical: 3 Things You Probably Didn't Know

More videos:

  • Review - Want A Job At Canonical? Write A 5000 Word Essay?!?
  • Review - Mark Shuttleworth - Canonical Vision

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GlusterFS and Canonical)

GlusterFS

Canonical

Cloud Storage
100 100%
Cloud Storage
0% 0
Cloud Computing
94 94%
Cloud Computing
6% 6
DevOps Tools
0 0%
DevOps Tools
100% 100
Storage
100 100%
Storage
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using GlusterFS and Canonical. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare GlusterFS and Canonical

GlusterFS Reviews

We have no reviews of GlusterFS yet.
Be the first one to post

Canonical Reviews

OpenShift alternatives
The biggest advantages of Canonical Kubernetes are flexibility and low cost of deployment. “Charmed Kubernetes” is an exciting operator-based approach to build infrastructures. “Charms” is a collection to seamlessly integrate and manage Kubernetes, container and VM-based applications across hybrid cloud environments. Canonical Kubernetes uses Ubuntu as operating system.
Source: www.ionos.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, GlusterFS seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

GlusterFS mentions (2)

  • [D] What are the compute options you've considered for your projects?
    I am a fan of Gearman to schedule and dispatch distributed jobs, Redis as a collaborative blackboard, and GlusterFS to share models across multiple systems and make bulk data available across the entire system (usually referenced in the blackboard as a pathname). Source: about 1 year ago
  • Gluster vs Oracle Gluster
    If you're not relying on support, then I would probably standardize on the latest packages available from gluster.org. Source: about 3 years ago

Canonical mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Canonical yet. Tracking of Canonical recommendations started around Oct 2022.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GlusterFS and Canonical, you can also consider the following products

Ceph - Ceph is a distributed object store and file system designed to provide excellent performance...

Linode - We make it simple to develop, deploy, and scale cloud infrastructure at the best price-to-performance ratio in the market.Sign up to Linode through SaaSHub and get a $100 in credit!

Minio - Minio is an open-source minimal cloud storage server.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk - Quickly deploy and manage applications in the AWS cloud.

rkt - App Container runtime

Jotform - Free Online Form Builder & Form Creator

Loading...