Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

GNU Make VS Typst

Compare GNU Make VS Typst and see what are their differences

GNU Make logo GNU Make

GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

Typst logo Typst

Focus on your text and let Typst take care of layout and formatting. Join the wait list so you can be part of the beta phase.
  • GNU Make Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-12
  • Typst Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-08

GNU Make videos

No GNU Make videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Typst videos

Typst: The LaTeX alternative in Rust

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GNU Make and Typst)
Front End Package Manager
Document Management
0 0%
100% 100
JS Build Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Text Editors
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using GNU Make and Typst. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Typst seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 19 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

GNU Make mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of GNU Make yet. Tracking of GNU Make recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Typst mentions (19)

  • Is there a BNF grammar of the TeX language? (2010)
    Typst[1] is another tool which implements document generation from the ground up. Zerodha had a great article [2] how they migrated from LaTeX based pdf generation to Typst, which ended up saving time and compute. [1]: https://typst.app/. - Source: Hacker News / 20 days ago
  • LaTeX and Neovim for technical note-taking
    I have been using Typst[1] for taking notes on machine learning. It's fast (updates are instantaneous). The syntax is almost like Markdown. I tried to learn LaTeX but Typst seems to have an easier learning curve. [1]: https://typst.app/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • LaTeX and Neovim for technical note-taking
    I'd personally consider using Typst (https://typst.app) instead of LaTeX. It has a much more readable syntax and you don't need as much snippets to write it. You can use in on their website or run the compiler locally just like LaTeX. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • I'm able to take notes in mathematics lectures using LaTeX and Vim (2019)
    For writing math notes (especially in vim), I switch to using Typst (https://typst.app). Here's a few points: - The syntax is a lot lighter and easier to type fast. I was up and running in half hour after starting to use it. Once in a while I can look up some symbol name in the docs but that's about it. - Empty document is a valid document. No preambles, no includes etc, it's all optional and the defaults are... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • I don't always use LaTeX, but when I do, I compile to HTML (2013)
    Have you seen typst? I have moved over from LaTex to Typst and most if not all your use cases are covered. https://typst.app/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GNU Make and Typst, you can also consider the following products

CMake - CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.

Quarto - Open-source scientific and technical publishing system built on Pandoc.

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

Obsidian.md - A second brain, for you, forever. Obsidian is a powerful knowledge base that works on top of a local folder of plain text Markdown files.

Ninja Build - Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.

Icons8 - Free app for Mac & Windows already containing 39,800 icons. Allows to search and import icons…