Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

GNU Make VS Visual Build

Compare GNU Make VS Visual Build and see what are their differences

SysAid
SysAid is a comprehensive AI-powered Help Desk & ITSM platform with generative AI implemented into every element of service management featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

GNU Make logo GNU Make

GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

Visual Build logo Visual Build

Visual Build enables developers and build masters to create an automated, repeatable build process.
  • GNU Make Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-12
  • Visual Build Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-19

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GNU Make and Visual Build)

GNU Make

Visual Build

Front End Package Manager
100 100%
Front End Package Manager
0% 0
DevOps Tools
0 0%
DevOps Tools
100% 100
JS Build Tools
100 100%
JS Build Tools
0% 0
Continuous Integration
76 76%
Continuous Integration
24% 24

User comments

Share your experience with using GNU Make and Visual Build. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GNU Make and Visual Build, you can also consider the following products

CMake - CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.

Ansible - Radically simple configuration-management, application deployment, task-execution, and multi-node orchestration engine

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

FinalBuilder - FinalBuilder is a build automation tool.

Ninja Build - Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.

Capistrano - A remote server automation and deployment tool written in Ruby

Loading...