I've read the study from health.com. I'm not impressed with their methodology: They do an incredibly poor job of control groups. It's even in the research you cite. Source: about 1 year ago

I think this subreddit is subject to this in a big way right now. For instance: a very neutral article I posted from health.com has a 50% downvote rate. It's almost as if people are in here just downvoting literally everything to keep it from popping up on Google... Source: over 1 year ago

It could be a wholly new ingredient that hasn't been used before, and no one talked about it for some reason. That's pretty unlikely though. I think that health.com simply got its facts wrong. Source: almost 2 years ago

These sound like pretty generic requests (in a good way — no specialty therapy needed to focus on interpersonal relationships), so you probably just have to see if the therapist gels with you. Go for ease of location and peruse some profiles to start. If money is an object, well then, you’re more limited. If you are open to online, betterhelp.com is completely virtual sessions that might be more affordable…... Source: about 2 years ago

I had been interested in a galacatagogic beer with a lot of herbs, but generically the effect of having a small amount of beer in your blood system can change the flavor of the milk and reduce the amount a newborn might feed. My partner quite enjoyed lactation cookies. I don't remember her recipe but there's a writeup from health.com that might be helpful. Source: over 2 years ago

Observe how news media treat story like this. https://time.com - first page, main story, no photos https://www.reuters.com - no mention https://apnews.com - first page, 2nd block in list, no photos https://www.nytimes.com - second page, tiny block in list, no photos https://www.washingtonpost.com - second page, tiny block, no photos https://www.theguardian.com/world - no mention https://www.aljazeera.com - first... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

If it's any consolation, it was top billing on cnn.com yesterday, which is where I first saw it. Entire top left of the screen was the woman's face and a huge headline. Now it's buried in a couple lines below the (digital) fold. Source: 7 months ago

Try and force the page by entering a url in the browser such as cnn.com . Also, try loading a full browser and trying to surf. What type of phone are you on? Source: 7 months ago

FWIW, I had to disable the Wipr content filtering on cnn.com to see the web site. Guess I'll get my news fix from wapo.com, now. Source: 7 months ago

I don't know what EasyList or uBlock are (i.e., I don't use those), but I got blocked by cnn.com as well. Firefox on Mac. Turns out it was the "I don't care about cookies" extension (automatically accept consent requests). Once I disabled that for cnn, it worked again. Source: 7 months ago