Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Highlight VS Sitecake

Compare Highlight VS Sitecake and see what are their differences

Contrast Webinars
Effortless webinars, powerfully engaging. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Highlight logo Highlight

"Highlight" physical books through conductive pages 📖✨

Sitecake logo Sitecake

Drag and drop CMS for HTML websites. It's flat file CMS so it's pretty fast.
  • Highlight Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-21
  • Sitecake Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-09-11

Highlight videos

+ Add

Leicester 0-2 Arsenal Highlight | Review Pertandingan Leicester vs Arsenal |

More videos:

  • Review - HIGHLIGHT for revision at school & work | my colour-coding review system
  • Review - UA Highlight MC Football Cleat Review - Ep. 301

Sitecake videos

+ Add

Editing a Website with Sitecake CMS

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Highlight and Sitecake)

Highlight

Sitecake

Productivity
100 100%
Productivity
0% 0
CMS
0 0%
CMS
100% 100
Developer Tools
100 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0
Blogging Platform
0 0%
Blogging Platform
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Highlight and Sitecake. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Sitecake seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Highlight mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Highlight yet. Tracking of Highlight recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Sitecake mentions (5)

  • Maintaining this site fucking sucks
    Use something like this? CMS that generates static html? https://sitecake.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Publii: Open-source local WYSIWYG static site CMS
    I think that user experience of website builders with wysiwyg and drag and drop UX won over time. Then, as time passed by, website builders become bloated and complex. Once again you needed a professional to maintain your site in site builder. So now simple solutions, static HTML, free or one-time fee CMSs are sexy again. (economy is not good, who wants another subscription?) I know because 14 years ago we have... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Best solution that would give clients the ability to edit content on their extremely minimal/simple site?
    Https://sitecake.com/ works with simple html and PHP sites.... Veeeerrrry simple for client edits. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Conventional approach to allowing business owner to edit static site?
    May be a suitable use case for https://sitecake.com/. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Do you know any No-Code CMS or Data-Base for self-hosted Webflow Sites?
    Other than that: Inline Editing CMS examples: Coast CMS, all you need to do is make the html editable with some classes and you're done. The CMS is kind of outdated though. Other examples: simplyedit.io, surrealcms.com, jocms.net, inlinecms.com, sitecake.com. Source: about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Highlight and Sitecake, you can also consider the following products

LINER - LINER AI Copilot is currently powered by ChatGPT/GPT-4, Google Search Engine, and information from high-quality highlights of an enormous number of users from all around the world.

ClassicPress - The WordPress fork. No Gutenberg. Great future!

Highly for iOS - Medium-style highlighting in every app and website. 🖌

TYPO3 - TYPO3.com - Infos, SLAs, Extended Support Versions and more

Disbug - Bug reporting tool that records screen and posts to Jira along with console & network logs

Anchor CMS - Free and lightweight blogging system

Loading...