Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Hugo VS CKEditor

Compare Hugo VS CKEditor and see what are their differences

WiX
Create a free website with Wix.com. Customize with Wix' website builder, no coding skills needed. Choose a design, begin customizing and be online today featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Hugo logo Hugo

Hugo is a general-purpose website framework for generating static web pages.

CKEditor logo CKEditor

Real-time collaborative future-ready rich text editor
  • Hugo Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-21
  • CKEditor Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-08

CKEditor 5 is a modern WYSIWYG rich text editor that can easily accommodate the requirements of businesses and users in the age of digital transformation. It allows software creators and developers to build powerful writing solutions for applications of all sorts, within hours. Thanks to a fully customizable framework, ready-to-use builds, native integrations, extensive documentation, and reliable customer support, the editor can be fully tailored to your needs.

To provide users with all-around streamlined and collaborative writing experience, you can additionally include advanced features such as Track Changes and Comments, Revision History, and (if preferred) Real-time Collaboration! Easy Export to PDF and Word, responsive images, pagination, Markdown input and output support, and robust paste from Word and Google Docs are also popular choices.

Hugo features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

CKEditor features and specs

  • Real-time collaboration editing: Premium
  • Comments: Premium
  • Track changes: Premium
  • Revision History: Premium
  • CKBox File Manager: Premium
  • Autoformatting: Yes
  • Autolink: Yes
  • Autosave: Yes
  • Basic text styles (Bold, Italic, Highlight, Underline, Strikethrough, Subscript, Superscript): Yes
  • Code & Quote Blocks: Yes
  • Drag and drop: Yes
  • Export to PDF and Word: Premium
  • Find and replace: Yes
  • Font styles: Yes
  • Image resize, style & alignment: Yes
  • Image responsiveness: Yes
  • Inserting images by pasting URL: Yes
  • Keyboard shortcuts: Yes
  • Lists (bulleted, numbered, checklists): Yes
  • Markdown support: Yes
  • Math and Chemical formulas: Premium
  • Media embed: Yes
  • @Mentions: Yes
  • Pagination: Premium
  • Paste from Word & G-Docs: Yes
  • Read-only support: Yes
  • Restricted editing: Yes
  • Spell and grammar checking: Premium
  • Tables support with columns resizing, selecting rows and columns: Yes
  • Text layout: Yes
  • Word count: Yes
  • React integration: Yes
  • Vue JS integration: Yes
  • Angular integration: Yes

Hugo videos

+ Add

Hugo - Movie Review by Chris Stuckmann

More videos:

  • Review - Hugo - A Love Letter to Cinema
  • Review - Hugo Review (funny movie review)

CKEditor videos

+ Add

CKEditor 5 - Collaboration features

More videos:

  • Demo - CKEditor 5 – Revision History feature

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Hugo and CKEditor)

Hugo

CKEditor

Blogging
100 100%
Blogging
0% 0
Text Editors
0 0%
Text Editors
100% 100
Static Site Generators
100 100%
Static Site Generators
0% 0
Rich Text Editor
0 0%
Rich Text Editor
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Hugo and CKEditor. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Hugo and CKEditor

Hugo Reviews

Top 10 Next.js Alternatives You Can Try
If you are looking for a powerful static website generator, Hugo is a good alternative to Next.js. You can build multilingual websites much faster and in a simple way that no other platform will offer you. Furthermore, this platform will increase your experience in creating websites with beautiful Markdown syntax and pre-built features like commenting.
Source: www.zegocloud.com
20 Next.js Alternatives Worth Considering
Certainly. Jekyll and Hugo are popular static site generators that don’t rely on React.js. Jekyll uses Ruby, while Hugo is renowned for its speed and simplicity. These options are excellent for projects focusing on content-driven sites without heavy JavaScript frameworks.
Source: tms-outsource.com
10 static site generators to watch in 2021
Perhaps most conveniently described as Jekyll implemented with JavaScript rather than Ruby, Eleventy has now moved beyond that while retaining a clear and simple on-ramp, and only shipping to the browser what you tell it too. As with Jekyll and Hugo, no JavaScript frameworks are auto-baked in.
Source: www.netlify.com
Hugo vs Jekyll: an Epic Battle of Static Site Generator Themes
Hugo does something similar with its menu templates. You can define menu links in your Hugo site config, and even add useful properties that Hugo understands, like weighting. Here’s a definition of the menu above in config.yaml:
Source: www.freecodecamp.org
Top Static Site Generators For 2019
Hugo is a static site generator which is also very popular which is proven by over 30,000 stars on GitHub right now. Hugo is based on the Go programming language which is great if you have already gained some knowledge of Go. Hugo claims that it is the fastest framework for building websites. In fact Hugo comes with an ultra-fast build process and makes building static...
Source: medium.com

CKEditor Reviews

14 Best Open Source WYSIWYG HTML Editors
CKEditor 5 is a feature-rich and open-source WYSIWYG editing solution with great flexibility. The user interface looks modern. Hence, you may expect a modern user experience.
Source: itsfoss.com
Looking for a CKEditor? Try these 10 Alternatives
CKEditor is a popular, versatile WYSIWYG text editor which allows you to write content directly on web pages or online applications. It can be used to create Word-like documents or provide a simple toolbar for email and instant message content. CKEditor provides rich text formatting options as well as spell check.
Source: blog.hubspot.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Hugo seems to be a lot more popular than CKEditor. While we know about 358 links to Hugo, we've tracked only 8 mentions of CKEditor. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Hugo mentions (358)

  • Cloud Resume Challenge - Chunk 3
    This required me to revisit my Hugo website. I opened up the developer tools in Edge to figure out which section was which to decide where I wanted to place my hit counter. - Source: dev.to / 29 days ago
  • Cloud Resume Challenge Chunk 1
    I am not a front-end web developer, and UI/UX design is not one of my skills. So, rather than fumble around trying to make my resume webpage look good, I decided to use a static website generator. I chose to use Hugo, since they have a lot of templates to choose from. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • How to deploy your own website on AWS
    Hugo Existing themes will get you a website quick, such that you only have to modify color schemes and layouts. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Good alternatives to Heroku
    And last but not least, Netlify, which is the one I use to host this website(for free). Hugo + Netlify is a powerful combination. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Building static websites
    At one point though I realized there is a scaling problem with my build minutes. I knew that golang has considerably faster builds and in my case the easy fix is swapping over to Hugo. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
View more

CKEditor mentions (8)

  • Rails Frontend Bundling - Which one should I choose?
    Problematic dependencies. Some dependencies like CKEditor are designed specifically to work with Webpacker and won't work with other tools. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Best Text Editor to integrate with React?
    At my work, we recently released a beta of our switch CKEditor, coming from Draftjs. Works pretty well. They have a free license available, not sure if that would cover your use-case tho. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Managers want to build a Web Rich Text Editor from scratch - Seems like bad idea
    Every place where the mismanager wanted a rich text editor ended up skinning/modding what is now called CKEditor . It used to be called "FCKEditor" because of the initials of the guy who wrote it, but almost everyone reading it put the letter U in where it didn't belong. Sorry Frederico Caldeira Knabben. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Any good libraries for rich text editors out there?
    CKEditor offers rich text editing, and is a fantastic bit of kit I've used extensively over the past couple of years. It does cost money, but it's worth it. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Django for Beginners #4 - The Blog App
    Recall that in the previous article, when you create a post, you can only add plain text, which is not ideal for a blog article. The rich text editor or WYSIWYG HTML editor allows you to edit HTML pages directly without writing the code. In this tutorial, I am using the CKEditor as an example. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Hugo and CKEditor, you can also consider the following products

Jekyll - Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.

TinyMCE - TinyMCE is a content editor that functions as a plug-in for Wordpress websites.

Ghost - Ghost is a fully open source, adaptable platform for building and running a modern online publication. We power blogs, magazines and journalists from Zappos to Sky News.

Summernote - Summernote is a JavaScript library that helps users create WYSIWYG editors online.

WordPress - WordPress is web software you can use to create a beautiful website or blog. We like to say that WordPress is both free and priceless at the same time.

Quill - Powerful, API-driven rich text editor

Loading...