Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Hugo VS CodeClimate

Compare Hugo VS CodeClimate and see what are their differences

Hugo logo Hugo

Hugo is a general-purpose website framework for generating static web pages.

CodeClimate logo CodeClimate

Code Climate provides automated code review for your apps, letting you fix quality and security issues before they hit production. We check every commit, branch and pull request for changes in quality and potential vulnerabilities.
  • Hugo Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-21
  • CodeClimate Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-04

Hugo videos

Hugo - Movie Review by Chris Stuckmann

More videos:

  • Review - Hugo - A Love Letter to Cinema
  • Review - Hugo Review (funny movie review)

CodeClimate videos

SaaS Chat: SaaSTV, the Affordable Care Act website, CodeClimate for code reviews

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Hugo and CodeClimate)
Blogging
100 100%
0% 0
Code Coverage
0 0%
100% 100
Static Site Generators
100 100%
0% 0
Code Analysis
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Hugo and CodeClimate. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Hugo and CodeClimate

Hugo Reviews

Top 10 Next.js Alternatives You Can Try
If you are looking for a powerful static website generator, Hugo is a good alternative to Next.js. You can build multilingual websites much faster and in a simple way that no other platform will offer you. Furthermore, this platform will increase your experience in creating websites with beautiful Markdown syntax and pre-built features like commenting.
20 Next.js Alternatives Worth Considering
Certainly. Jekyll and Hugo are popular static site generators that don’t rely on React.js. Jekyll uses Ruby, while Hugo is renowned for its speed and simplicity. These options are excellent for projects focusing on content-driven sites without heavy JavaScript frameworks.
10 static site generators to watch in 2021
Perhaps most conveniently described as Jekyll implemented with JavaScript rather than Ruby, Eleventy has now moved beyond that while retaining a clear and simple on-ramp, and only shipping to the browser what you tell it too. As with Jekyll and Hugo, no JavaScript frameworks are auto-baked in.
Source: www.netlify.com
Hugo vs Jekyll: an Epic Battle of Static Site Generator Themes
Hugo does something similar with its menu templates. You can define menu links in your Hugo site config, and even add useful properties that Hugo understands, like weighting. Here’s a definition of the menu above in config.yaml:
Top Static Site Generators For 2019
Hugo is a static site generator which is also very popular which is proven by over 30,000 stars on GitHub right now. Hugo is based on the Go programming language which is great if you have already gained some knowledge of Go. Hugo claims that it is the fastest framework for building websites. In fact Hugo comes with an ultra-fast build process and makes building static...
Source: medium.com

CodeClimate Reviews

11 Interesting Tools for Auditing and Managing Code Quality
Code Climate is an analytics tool that is extremely useful for an organization that emphasizes quality. Code Climate offers two different products:
Source: geekflare.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Hugo seems to be a lot more popular than CodeClimate. While we know about 358 links to Hugo, we've tracked only 11 mentions of CodeClimate. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Hugo mentions (358)

  • Cloud Resume Challenge - Chunk 3
    This required me to revisit my Hugo website. I opened up the developer tools in Edge to figure out which section was which to decide where I wanted to place my hit counter. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Cloud Resume Challenge Chunk 1
    I am not a front-end web developer, and UI/UX design is not one of my skills. So, rather than fumble around trying to make my resume webpage look good, I decided to use a static website generator. I chose to use Hugo, since they have a lot of templates to choose from. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • How to deploy your own website on AWS
    Hugo Existing themes will get you a website quick, such that you only have to modify color schemes and layouts. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Good alternatives to Heroku
    And last but not least, Netlify, which is the one I use to host this website(for free). Hugo + Netlify is a powerful combination. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Building static websites
    At one point though I realized there is a scaling problem with my build minutes. I knew that golang has considerably faster builds and in my case the easy fix is swapping over to Hugo. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
View more

CodeClimate mentions (11)

  • free-for.dev
    Codeclimate.com — Automated code review, free for Open Source and unlimited organisation-owned private repos (up to 4 collaborators). Also free for students and institutions. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • How To Use Code Climate To Improve Software Quality
    Want to know how to enforce allowing only high-quality software into production? Check out this post on how to use CodeClimate can help you do just that! #DevOps #SoftwareDeveloper #softwaredevelopment #SoftwareEngineering #webdevelopment #codequality. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • RFC: A Full-stack Analytics Platform Architecture
    Ideally, software can quickly go from development to production. Continuous deployment and delivery are some processes that make this possible. Continuous deployment means establishing an automated pipeline from development to production while continuous delivery means maintaining the main branch in a deployable state so that a deployment can be requested at any time. Predecos uses these tools. When a commit goes... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • Adding coverage to CI pipeline?
    The new code should not drop existing code coverage I've found in practice mainly catches changes to existing code that lack proper updates to existing tests. Our company uses Code Climate for these checks, so we don't have to manage / write our own tooling for this purpose. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Node.js best practices list (July 2021)
    TL;DR: Using static analysis tools helps by giving objective ways to improve code quality and keeps your code maintainable. You can add static analysis tools to your CI build to fail when it finds code smells. Its main selling points over plain linting are the ability to inspect quality in the context of multiple files (e.g. Detect duplications), perform advanced analysis (e.g. Code complexity), and follow the... - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Hugo and CodeClimate, you can also consider the following products

Jekyll - Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

Ghost - Ghost is a fully open source, adaptable platform for building and running a modern online publication. We power blogs, magazines and journalists from Zappos to Sky News.

Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.

WordPress - WordPress is web software you can use to create a beautiful website or blog. We like to say that WordPress is both free and priceless at the same time.

ESLint - The fully pluggable JavaScript code quality tool