Based on our record, Google Patents seems to be a lot more popular than ICOholder. While we know about 85 links to Google Patents, we've tracked only 7 mentions of ICOholder. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Another Great News Guys! There's a lot happening in ARCUS right now! Arcus is a bow and arrow combat P2E NFT game with a scholarship and auto pay-out system. It is a Hidden gem I backed right now and was added to https://icoholder.com! Source: almost 2 years ago
Nodle - Crowdsourced Decentralized Network was added to https://icoholder.com/ and is available here: https://icoholder.com/en/nodle-crowdsourced-decentralized-network-1017368. Source: almost 2 years ago
Maybe try getting in touch with ICOholder - there is an email up there.. I know they offer a wide range of services and they can arrange some PR as well - featuring articles in some publications.. Ask them, you never know! Hope it helps! Source: almost 2 years ago
Altura was added to http://icoholder.com and is available here: https://icoholder.com/en/ico-1001423. Source: about 2 years ago
Lido for Solana was added to http://icoholder.com and is available here:. Source: over 2 years ago
> they deliberately didn't patent it If you'll check the historical record you'll find, for example, patents US2524035A (Bardeen&Brattain, Three-electrode circuit element utilizing semiconductive materials, oldest priority 1948-02-26) and US2569347A (Shockley, Circuit element utilizing semiconductive material, oldest priority 1948-06-26). > How 'bout the amplifiers on the optical fibers? patents.google.com... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
I don't have that hope with past "due diligence" track records. Performing a quick peek for the author at Google Patents I only see mentions of his involvement with neural networks in past work [1]. I am not an expert in patents but I assume that they will apply there and/or publish papers before the company is launched. Except if the breakthrough is not there or it is really revolutionary but statistics are not... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
Yeah. Last I'd heard (2018?) they were trying to get into the 3d printing business, but since their main site doesn't say anything to that note I have to believe it's not going too well. https://patents.google.com/?assignee=Xerox+Corporation&sort=new. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
Its actually a hard problem: the massive boom that's required to provide reach is inherently quite unstable, not in the mm or cm but we're talking decimeters here. Some of the core tech of FBR dating back ~15 yrs addresses this kind of dynamic stabilization. FBR is impressive and they've built decent an IP. [1] https://patents.google.com/?inventor=Mark+Joseph+Pivac. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
The process of analysing some of the patents is quite tedious I have to admit. Google Patents (https://patents.google.com/) is great and all, but it's not fun to browse patents. So far I haven't found a better way of doing this. If you are interested in just the gist of some of these patents you are welcome to read my notes daily on them here: https://100yearpatents.com. Source: 9 months ago
ICODrops - ICO calendar, ratings, bounty list and more
Patent Monk - The patent search engine you always wanted to exist
Coinvision - AI-powered data for the cryptocurrency and ICO market
GoodIP IQ - Get understandable and actionable insights about the innovation and patent strategy of any company.
ICObench - ICOs ratings from blockchain investors
Blockchain Demo - Visual demonstration of blockchain technology