Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
i

if.team VS Copyleaks

Compare if.team VS Copyleaks and see what are their differences

Content Guardian AI
The only 8-in-1 AI content detector platform in the world. We integrate with leading AI content detectors to give unparalleled confidence that your content appear to be written by a human. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

if.team logo if.team

Improving project efficiency through budget optimization

Copyleaks logo Copyleaks

Identify potential plagiarism, uncover AI-generated content, and empower error-free writing with AI
  • if.team Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-24
  • Copyleaks Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-18

Copyleaks is an AI-based text analysis company used by businesses, educational institutions, and millions of individuals around the world to identify potential plagiarism and paraphrasing across nearly every language, detect AI-generated content, verify authenticity and ownership, and empower error-free writing.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to if.team and Copyleaks)

if.team

Copyleaks

API
100 100%
API
0% 0
Plagiarism Checker
0 0%
Plagiarism Checker
100% 100
Chat GPT
100 100%
Chat GPT
0% 0
Writing Tools
9 9%
Writing Tools
91% 91

User comments

Share your experience with using if.team and Copyleaks. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Copyleaks seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 11 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

if.team mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of if.team yet. Tracking of if.team recommendations started around May 2023.

Copyleaks mentions (11)

  • A researcher who publishes a study every two days reveals the darker side of science: Spain’s most prolific scientific academic — meat expert José Manuel Lorenzo — put his name on 176 papers last year, exposing an underworld of shady practices
    Of course, are you living under stone? Source: about 1 year ago
  • Jiffies of epiphanies in Canada
    He didn't use GPT. I checked on copyleaks.com. It's wrong to assume someone cannot write such. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Is anyone else nervous about papers or projects being flagged as AI?
    I used writer.com then copyleaks.com. Source: about 1 year ago
  • [MAY] - Best Tools for Detecting AI Generated Content
    Copyleaks AI Content Detector [copyleaks.com] - Includes Chrome Extension. Allows users to hover over text and determine if content is human generated or AI generated. Source: about 1 year ago
  • The apology article appears to be AI generated
    BTW why did you assume zerogpt.com and gptzero.me marking it as AI content is trustworthy but sapling.ai, writer.com, contentatscale.ai or copyleaks.com marking it as written by human aren't? Source: about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing if.team and Copyleaks, you can also consider the following products

Eden AI - Regrouping the best AI APIs for 10mn integration in your code

Turnitin - Turnitin is preferred by educational institutions around the world for preventing plagiarism. Instructors at all levels of education can request that students use the service to submit papers, and Turnitin checks those papers for plagiarism.

GitLocalize - Localize your GitHub repository, continuously.

iThenticate - Prevent Plagiarism in Published Works

Dowork - A collaborative software cost and time estimation app

Unicheck - The plagiarism checker Unplag scans across the internet, repositories, open sources content and databases. It delivers real-time results and has no cached data.

Loading...