Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

INAP Bare Metal VS Azure Site Recovery

Compare INAP Bare Metal VS Azure Site Recovery and see what are their differences

INAP Bare Metal logo INAP Bare Metal

INAP Bare Metal is an intelligent monitoring service for bare metal dedicated and virtual servers.

Azure Site Recovery logo Azure Site Recovery

Azure Site Recovery can protect Microsoft Hyper-V, VMware, and physical servers, and you can use Azure or your secondary datacenter as your recovery site.
  • INAP Bare Metal Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-12-21
  • Azure Site Recovery Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-10

INAP Bare Metal features and specs

  • Performance
    INAP Bare Metal servers offer high performance because they provide dedicated hardware resources without the overhead of virtualization. This ensures better utilization of CPU, memory, and storage resources, which can be critical for high-performance workloads.
  • Customization
    With INAP Bare Metal servers, you have the flexibility to customize hardware configurations to match your specific requirements, including choice of CPU, memory, storage options, and network interfaces. This is valuable for applications with unique needs.
  • Security
    Bare Metal servers provide increased security as they are single-tenant environments, reducing the risk of vulnerabilities that can come from multi-tenancy in shared virtual environments. This is especially important for compliance-sensitive industries.
  • Predictable Pricing
    INAP’s Bare Metal solutions come with predictable pricing models, which can simplify budgeting and financial planning compared to pay-as-you-go pricing commonly found in cloud environments.
  • Improved Control
    With Bare Metal servers, you have full control over the server's operating system and applications, granting you the ability to optimize and manage the server settings at a granular level.

Possible disadvantages of INAP Bare Metal

  • Cost
    Bare Metal servers can be more expensive compared to shared or virtualized hosting options due to the dedicated nature of the hardware resources. This might not be cost-effective for smaller or low-resource-intensive applications.
  • Scalability
    Scaling Bare Metal infrastructure can be more challenging and slower compared to virtualized environments. Adding or upgrading hardware typically takes more time and effort, making it less suitable for rapidly changing or unpredictable workloads.
  • Management Overhead
    Managing Bare Metal servers usually requires more in-depth knowledge and resources compared to managed or cloud services. This includes maintaining the hardware, operating system, and any installed software, which can increase operational complexity.
  • Provisioning Time
    Provisioning Bare Metal servers often takes more time than deploying virtual instances in the cloud, making it less ideal for situations that require quick deployment or scaling.
  • Flexibility
    Compared to virtual servers, Bare Metal servers lack the same level of flexibility and agility inherent in cloud-based solutions, such as the ability to easily resize instances or quickly switch between different configurations.

Azure Site Recovery features and specs

  • Comprehensive Disaster Recovery
    Azure Site Recovery provides a robust disaster recovery solution that helps maintain business continuity by keeping your applications running during outages.
  • Platform Versatility
    Supports a wide range of platforms including VMware, Hyper-V, and physical servers, offering flexibility in adoption across different IT environments.
  • Integration with Microsoft Products
    Seamless integration with other Microsoft services such as Azure Backup, Azure Virtual Machines, and broader Azure ecosystem enhances performance and capabilities.
  • Ease of Use
    Azure Site Recovery is relatively easy to set up and manage, especially for organizations already familiar with Azure services.
  • Automation Capabilities
    Supports automated failover and recovery testing, reducing the need for manual intervention and streamlining operations.

Possible disadvantages of Azure Site Recovery

  • Cost Considerations
    While Azure Site Recovery offers substantial benefits, it can become expensive, particularly for large-scale deployments or extensive use.
  • Complex Pricing Model
    Understanding and predicting costs can be challenging due to Azure's pricing structure, which may complicate budget planning.
  • Learning Curve
    Organizations new to Azure might encounter a learning curve, needing time and resources to fully understand and effectively implement the service.
  • Internet Dependence
    Reliance on internet connectivity can be a drawback, especially in regions where internet infrastructure is not robust or reliable.
  • Potential Performance Impact
    During replication processes, there might be an impact on system performance, which needs to be managed through careful planning and resource allocation.

INAP Bare Metal videos

No INAP Bare Metal videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Azure Site Recovery videos

Zone to Zone Disaster Recovery with Azure Site Recovery | Azure Friday

More videos:

  • Review - Azure Migrate - #3 - Azure Site Recovery Single VM
  • Review - Azure (Beginners to Professional) Part-25, Azure Site Recovery Testing, VM Failover, Recovery

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to INAP Bare Metal and Azure Site Recovery)
Development
74 74%
26% 26
Monitoring Tools
51 51%
49% 49
Network & Admin
75 75%
25% 25
Cloud Computing
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using INAP Bare Metal and Azure Site Recovery. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Azure Site Recovery seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

INAP Bare Metal mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of INAP Bare Metal yet. Tracking of INAP Bare Metal recommendations started around Sep 2021.

Azure Site Recovery mentions (3)

  • A Step by Step Guide on How to Migrate from AWS to Azure
    During this, you will need to ensure continuous data synchronization. For this, You can use Azure Site Recovery for real-time replication of virtual machines and the Azure Database Migration Service (DMS) to move databases seamlessly. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Veeam, can I use it for Hyper-V replication to cloud for failover?
    You are better off using Azure Site Recovery. Source: over 2 years ago
  • On Prem HyperV VM's to Azure (Immutable Storage with Versioning)
    I've not personally used it yet but I think you may want to look at Azure Site Recovery if you've not already. It should create a local VM on your Hyper-V server and replicate the VMs to azure. Source: over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing INAP Bare Metal and Azure Site Recovery, you can also consider the following products

Aptum - Peer1 is an online platform for hosting, cloud, colocation, and connectivity services.

Zerto - Virtual replication & recovery solution

10gbps.io - DataPacket is a dedicated server provider with data centers in 20 locations worldwide. Get high-performance servers with unshared 10 Gbps ports. Multihomed network with 10 TIER-1 transit providers. 24/7 live support over multiple channels.

Acronis Disaster Recovery - Acronis Disaster Recovery Service is a comprehensive enterprise solution that integrates with IT to protect and restore data and servers. Learn more today!

Server4you - Server4you is a web hosting platform that allows many web designer and developer to get their web site to be on track with robust traffics.

Barracuda MSP - Barracuda MSP is the first and only MSP-focused provider of advanced threat protection with backup & disaster recovery - complete data protection for MSPs.