Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Make.com VS BuildJet for GitHub Actions

Compare Make.com VS BuildJet for GitHub Actions and see what are their differences

Flagsmith
Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Make.com logo Make.com

Tool for workflow automation (Former Integromat)

BuildJet for GitHub Actions logo BuildJet for GitHub Actions

We provide users with managed high-performance runners for Github Actions.
  • Make.com Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-05
  • BuildJet for GitHub Actions Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-04

Make.com videos

+ Add

Zapier vs Integromat - Quick Comparison Review

More videos:

  • Review - Integromat feature tour
  • Review - Introduction to Integromat

BuildJet for GitHub Actions videos

No BuildJet for GitHub Actions videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Make.com and BuildJet for GitHub Actions)

Make.com

BuildJet for GitHub Actions

Automation
100 100%
Automation
0% 0
Productivity
0 0%
Productivity
100% 100
Web Service Automation
100 100%
Web Service Automation
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Make.com and BuildJet for GitHub Actions. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Make.com and BuildJet for GitHub Actions

Make.com Reviews

Top 9 MuleSoft Alternatives & Competitors in 2024
Make, one of the best Mulesoft alternatives, the ultimate IT process automation tool for enhancing efficiency, productivity, and collaboration. By automating routine tasks, integrating with existing infrastructure, and offering powerful workflow automation, Make empowers your team to streamline processes and achieve remarkable results.
Source: www.zluri.com
Zapier vs. Make.com: Which Automation Tool Will Take the Business Lead?
Make.com offers a cost-effective option for those looking for a business process automation solution, even if it may compromise usability and integration. From your scenario, Make.com seems like a realistic alternative for those with a more limited budget or those willing to work with additional API documentation and webhooks instead of the broader integration that Zapier...
Source: www.listproductsreview.com
7 Best Zapier Alternatives to Meet Your Integration Needs
Make.com is no different than other tools in this list given that it is a low-code platform, has a drag-and-drop interface, and enables users to automate workflows — which it calls “scenarios”. Make was known as Integromat before its rebranding in 2022, post which they have heavily invested in revamping their website and app UI.
Source: www.linkedin.com
Top 5 Best Integration Software for 2023
Make is a powerful visual platform which allows you to visually create and automate multi-step workflows, where scenarios are only limited by your imagination. There are thousands of customizable automation templates, which you can change with a simple drag-and-drop builder. The scenarios you create can be run instantly and watched in real time. Powerful filtering, data...
Source: everhelper.me
13 data integration tools: a comparative analysis of the top solutions
Make.com is a highly sought-after tool that allows for smooth data integration and transformation. It boasts an array of functionalities including custom app creation, storage for execution logs, and access to over 300 Make API endpoints, expediting the automation of tasks with ease.
Source: blog.n8n.io

BuildJet for GitHub Actions Reviews

We have no reviews of BuildJet for GitHub Actions yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, BuildJet for GitHub Actions seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Make.com mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Make.com yet. Tracking of Make.com recommendations started around Mar 2021.

BuildJet for GitHub Actions mentions (5)

  • Experiment: The costs of slow build times
    Disclaimer: Co-founder of https://buildjet.com/for-github-actions While more cores can certainly help with certain types of projects, such as those that can be easily parallelized, this is not always the case. For example, web app projects won't benefit as much from additional cores. Another important factor to consider is the single-core performance of each vCPU. Many server-class CPUs, such as those used by... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Blazing fast CI with MicroVMs
    Congratulations on the launch. It looks pretty much like a self-hosted version of https://buildjet.com/for-github-actions. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • CircleCI Announces Support for Gitlab
    I'm a bit biased as one of the founders of BuildJet, but we solve this exact issue. BuildJet for GitHub Actions, plugs elegantly into GitHub Actions. With 1-line change in your config, you get 2x speed for half of GitHub's price. Check it out @ https://buildjet.com/for-github-actions. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • We use GitHub Actions to build GitHub
    With BuildJet for GitHub Actions, you can get up to 64 vCPU as a GitHub Actions runner. We plug right into your existing setup and have a significantly higher per core performance compared to the native runner. Check us out here: https://buildjet.com/for-github-actions. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • GitHub Actions by Example
    Incoming shameless plug; if you don’t have to handle the hosting runners, but still to reap the benefits of having proper hardware (close to the metal). Check out BuildJet for GitHub actions[1] - 2x the speed for half the price. Easy to install and easy to revert. [1] https://buildjet.com/for-github-actions. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Make.com and BuildJet for GitHub Actions, you can also consider the following products

ifttt - IFTTT puts the internet to work for you. Create simple connections between the products you use every day.

RunsOn - Access the fastest and cheapest self-hosted runners on the market with a one-line change. Easily installable in your own AWS account. x64 and arm64 architectures supported.

Zapier - Connect the apps you use everyday to automate your work and be more productive. 1000+ apps and easy integrations - get started in minutes.

GitHub Actions - Automate your workflow from idea to production

n8n.io - Free and open fair-code licensed node based Workflow Automation Tool. Easily automate tasks across different services.

Actionsflow - Free Zapier alternative based on Github Actions

Loading...