Kata Containers VS Dockge

Compare Kata Containers VS Dockge and see what are their differences

Flagsmith

Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured

This page does not exist

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

Kata Containers

Lightweight virtual machines that seamlessly plug into the containers ecosystem.

Dockge

A fancy, easy-to-use and reactive self-hosted docker compose.yaml stack-oriented manager.

Landing page //
2024-07-03

Landing page //
2025-01-17

Kata Containers

Website: katacontainers.io

Edit details

Dockge

Website: dockge.kuma.pet

Edit details

Kata Containers features and specs

Security
Kata Containers offer enhanced security by providing hardware virtualization, which creates a secure boundary around each container. This isolation helps in protecting against attacks and vulnerabilities that might affect other containers.
Performance
Kata Containers are designed to have low overhead compared to traditional virtual machines, allowing them to run with performance akin to native containers while still benefiting from hardware-based isolation.
Compatibility
Kata Containers are compatible with the OCI container runtime specification, making it possible to integrate them with existing cloud-native tools and ecosystems like Kubernetes without significant changes.
Flexibility
They offer a flexible choice for deploying containerized workloads that require the security of virtual machines, allowing organizations to meet both performance and security requirements effectively.

Possible disadvantages of Kata Containers

Complexity
Implementing Kata Containers can introduce additional complexity compared to using regular containers, especially in managing the virtualization layer and ensuring smooth integration with existing container orchestration systems.
Resource Overhead
Although they are lightweight compared to traditional VMs, Kata Containers still incur more overhead than standard containers, requiring more resources in terms of CPU and memory.
Maturity
As a relatively newer technology, Kata Containers may not have the level of maturity and community support that more established container technologies enjoy, potentially leading to challenges in troubleshooting and support.
Infrastructure Requirements
Running Kata Containers effectively may require specific hardware features like VT-x/AMD-V for hardware virtualization, which can limit deployment options on older or less capable hardware.

Dockge features and specs

User-Friendly Interface
The website offers an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, which makes it accessible for users of all technical backgrounds.
Comprehensive Features
Dockge provides a wide range of features that cater to various user needs, enhancing its functionality and appeal.
Regular Updates
The platform is consistently updated with new features and improvements, ensuring that users have access to the latest tools and technologies.

Possible disadvantages of Dockge

Limited Support
Customer support options are limited, which can make it difficult for users to get help with any issues they encounter.
Learning Curve
Despite its user-friendly interface, new users may still experience a learning curve when trying to take full advantage of all its features.
Performance Issues
Some users have reported performance issues, such as slow loading times or occasional bugs, which can affect the overall user experience.

Kata Containers videos

+ Add

Kata Containers and gVisor a Quantitative Comparison

Dockge videos

+ Add

Dockge: The New Docker Manager You Need To See!

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Kata Containers and Dockge)

Kata Containers

Dockge

Developer Tools

53 53%

Developer Tools

47% 47

DevOps Tools

33 33%

DevOps Tools

67% 67

Containers As A Service

54 54%

Containers As A Service

46% 46

Cloud Computing

100 100%

Cloud Computing

0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Kata Containers and Dockge. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Kata Containers and Dockge

Kata Containers Reviews

We have no reviews of Kata Containers yet.
Be the first one to post

Dockge Reviews

Self Hosting Like Its 2025

Dockge is relatively new and created by the developer behind Uptime Kuma, which is a fantastic tool. Although it hasn’t yet reached the maturity of Portainer, Dockge truly excels in its simplicity. It’s also regularly updated, and the developer is prompt in addressing issues on GitHub.

Source: kiranet.org

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Kata Containers should be more popular than Dockge. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Kata Containers mentions (4)

Kubernetes Without Docker: Why Container Runtimes Are Changing the Game in 2025
Kata Containers Containers in VMs, because sometimes isolation means business. - Source: dev.to / 7 days ago
WASM Will Replace Containers
See https://katacontainers.io Turns out only containers is not secure enough. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
Comparing 3 Docker container runtimes - Runc, gVisor and Kata Containers
Although the documentation also mentions "youki", that is mentioned as a "drop-in replacement" of the default runtime basically doing the same, so let's stick with runc. The second runtime will be Kata runtime from Kata containers, since it runs small virtual machines which is good for showing how differently it uses the CPU and memory. This also adds a higher level of isolation with some downsides as well. And... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
Hacking Alibaba Cloud's Kubernetes Cluster
Ronen: Our case study with Alibaba revealed they were using shared Linux namespaces between containers, such as their management container and our container. Sharing Linux namespaces can be dangerous. When designing a system that shares namespaces or resources between management and regular user containers, constantly carefully assess and be aware of the risks involved. Container technologies like GVisor and Kata... - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago

Dockge mentions (2)

Self-hosting with Podman
Additionally at some point people behind this product decided to change the licensing model, and allow the use of community editions for up to 5 nodes. It wasn't my case, but that pushed me to use something more independent. So I started using dockge, then added another service for docker logs, version monitor, and keeps adding applications that are fun to use, for example homebox or bookstack. It was fun until I... - Source: dev.to / 16 days ago
Vecchio RaspberryPi, Nuova HomeLab!
--- - name: Install Dockge using Docker Compose hosts: raspberry_pi become: true tasks: - name: Ensure the required directories exist file: path: "{{ item }}" state: directory owner: root group: root mode: '0755' loop: - /opt/stacks - /opt/dockge - name: Download compose.yaml for Dockge get_url: url:... - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago