Keycloak Reviews

LT Browser by Lambdatest Reviews

1. Alick

   | Team Lead at Partnerize | over 3 years ago
   Our go to mobile testing tool

   LT Browser is the new defacto tool for responsive testing requirements. Being a ecommerce company with wide audience we need to stay on our toes to keep our users bouncing because of a UI bug. LT browser has been helping us for the past 3 months with testing on the latest mobile view ports. And my favorite feature is instant local testing by simply adding the URL and side by side comparison of two devices. And best part of the debugging is that we can see the changes being reflected in real time

   🏁 Competitors: BrowserStack, CrossBrowserTesting

   👍 Pros:    Latest devices resolution|Scroll sync with two devices|Intuitive interface|Integration with jira|Instant screenshot and bug reporting flow|Testing on various networks

   👎 Cons:    Cross browser testing is not possible|Missing the test analytics
2. chris-hewins

   | QA Engineer at Toast Inc | over 3 years ago
   Helped us develop mobile websites faster

   As website designers our team loves the way we can show all the progress to our clients. It helped us have a better transparency in our work. We can just screengrab the viewport and easily share it with clients. And the best part is the interface, it's intuitive enough that none of us have ever looked at the support doc. Ability to test the local url path and Integration with JIRA saves a lot of time and makes it easier to communicate within the team. Kudos Team LT Browser..!!

   🏁 Competitors: Blisk Browser

   👍 Pros:    45+ viewports to choose from|Intuitive ui and viewport comparison feature for quick visualisation|Can make changes on the go with the help of inbuilt development tools|Mobile touch feature helps to test user experience in mobile viewports.

   👎 Cons:    Comparison is available for only 2 viewports, it forces users to select and deselect the devices repeatedly. a grid with more devices can be a better solution
3. Alina-Novikava

   | Software QA Engineer at uTest | over 3 years ago
   Must have tool for web designers & developers

   Responsive testing can be a really daunting task. To ensure that all media queries are working properly for specific screen sizes is bound to be time consuming. However, LT browser has made the task comparatively easy for me and my team. It enabled us to test on multiple pre installed devices in no time. Plus, we can test over 2 devices at the same time in a side by side view.

   Our development team relies heavily over this tool since it offers hassle-free local testing experience, supports hot-reloading and offers developer tools to help us debug any UI bug on the go.

   Even our design team loves the LT browser due to its intuitiveness. They are always intrigued to check if the changes are rendering well and as per the design or not after every release cycle. With LT browser, they can do it easily without having to install anything or dealing with developer tools mobile-view debugging

   🏁 Competitors: Blisk

   👍 Pros:    You can integrate project management tools like jira|Simulate network bandwidth to test your website.|It offers two device views, which makes comparing easy by mirroring actions.|You get 30+ pre installed devices to test on and also make your own custom resolution device.

   👎 Cons:    Testing on an internet explorer using our custom device, there is no option!

Keycloak mentions (4)

• Beyond the login page

  Most of the time nowadays, I prefer offloading this to an identity provider, using OpenID Connect or soon Federated Credential Management (FedCM), even if that means shipping an identity provider as part of the deliverables (I generally go with Keycloak, with keycloak-config-cli to provision its configuration). I'm obviously biased though as I work in IT services, developping software mainly for... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago

• Okta Says Hackers Stole Data for All Customer Support Users

  Yet another breach of Okta... Why are companies not running something like keycloak [1] themselves? Are administrative/maintenance costs too high or is it plausible deniability? [1] https://keycloak.org. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

• I built a ready-to-use auth server with TypeScript and Express.js

  I'd stick with a solution like https://keycloak.org in that instance. Source: over 1 year ago

• Authelia is an open-source authentication/authorization server with 2FA/SSO

  A few more projects in this space: - Keycloak (you won't get fired for picking this)[0] - CloudFoundry's UAA[1] - Gluu [2] - Keratin [3] - OpenUnison [4] - Dex[5] - Netlify's GoTrue[6] All of these solutions are a bit different but here are some of the axes: - Whether or not they function as an OAuth provider - Whether they're centered around application-user-login (email + password) or application auth (OAuth) or... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago

LT Browser by Lambdatest mentions (0)