Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Lantern VS Oso

Compare Lantern VS Oso and see what are their differences

Lantern logo Lantern

Lantern delivers fast, reliable and secure access to the open internet. Download Lantern for free access to blocked videos, news, social media and more. Available for Windows, Android, Mac, Ubuntu.

Oso logo Oso

A batteries-included system for authorization.
  • Lantern Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-23
  • Oso Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-16

Drop Oso Cloud into your apps to quickly add roles, sharing, fine-grained access, or any other access model you can think of.

Lantern

Pricing URL
-
$ Details
Platforms
-

Oso

Website
osohq.com
$ Details
free
Platforms
Python Rust JavaScript Node JS Ruby Go

Lantern features and specs

  • Speed
    Lantern uses advanced techniques to find the fastest possible routes to deliver content, which can result in quicker access and data retrieval compared to other anti-censorship tools.
  • User-Friendly
    Lantern offers a straightforward, easy-to-use interface that even non-tech-savvy users can navigate with minimal guidance.
  • Automatic Censorship Detection
    Lantern can automatically detect when content is blocked and redirect users to an accessible source, providing seamless browsing without interruptions.
  • Cross-Platform
    Available for multiple operating systems including Windows, macOS, Android, and iOS, allowing users to access censored content across devices.
  • Freemium Model
    Offers a free version with basic functionalities, making it accessible to users who cannot afford to pay for anti-censorship tools.

Possible disadvantages of Lantern

  • Privacy Concerns
    Lantern is not a VPN and does not encrypt all internet traffic, which might expose users to privacy risks and surveillance.
  • Limited Data for Free Users
    The free version of Lantern has data limitations, which can be restrictive for users who require extensive use.
  • Potential Network Instability
    Depending on network conditions and server load, users may experience varying levels of connectivity and reliability.
  • Subscription Costs
    While the basic version is free, advanced features require a subscription, which may not be affordable for all users.
  • Not Fully Open Source
    Lantern's core is open source, but some components are proprietary, which can be a concern for users who prioritize complete transparency.

Oso features and specs

  • Declarative policy language
    Oso provides a declarative policy language called Polar that allows developers to write clear and concise authorization policies, making it easier to manage and understand access control rules.
  • Integrations
    Oso integrates easily with popular frameworks and languages, offering flexibility for developers to incorporate authorization functionality within their existing tech stack.
  • Fine-grained access control
    Oso supports fine-grained access control, enabling developers to specify precise permissions at various levels, such as user, role, and resource, enhancing security and customization.
  • Community and support
    Oso has an active community and provides resources such as documentation, guides, and support channels, helping developers with implementation and troubleshooting.
  • Policy simulation and testing
    Oso offers policy simulation and testing tools, allowing developers to test and validate authorization policies before deploying them in production environments.

Possible disadvantages of Oso

  • Learning curve
    Oso's Polar language may have a learning curve for developers unfamiliar with declarative policy languages, requiring time and effort to become proficient.
  • Complexity in large systems
    Managing authorization in very large systems can become complex with Oso, especially if the policies require extensive customization and fine-tuning.
  • Potential performance overhead
    Depending on how Oso is integrated and used, there may be some performance overhead, particularly in systems with high traffic and extensive authorization checks.
  • Limited offline usage
    Oso primarily functions as a cloud-based solution, which may limit its usage in environments requiring full offline operations or on-premise deployments.

Lantern videos

REI Co-op Gear Guide: Best Camping Lanterns

More videos:

  • Review - Lantern Reviews - Coast vs. Ozark vs. LifeGear
  • Review - Hurricane Lantern Review- The Feuerhand 276

Oso videos

OSO Vintage Style Chronograph 70's Style Watch Review

More videos:

  • Review - $300 For A Super Functional Retro Chronograph! (OSO Orbit Chronograph Review)
  • Review - The 70s With A Twist! - OSO Orbit Hybrid Chronograph Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Lantern and Oso)
VPN
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Security & Privacy
100 100%
0% 0
Security
43 43%
57% 57

User comments

Share your experience with using Lantern and Oso. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Lantern and Oso

Lantern Reviews

8 Online Alternatives That Are Cheaper Than Traditional In-Person Therapy
Lantern costs $49 per month and you can cancel at any time. Download Lantern for iOS or Android.
Source: themighty.com

Oso Reviews

We have no reviews of Oso yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Oso should be more popular than Lantern. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Lantern mentions (4)

  • For some reason, the recommended vpns on this sub (mullvad, IVPN, etc) are all banned in my country. Any good alternatives?
    I still think it's quite odd you can't access the website even with different DNS and Tor. You can also try something like https://getlantern.org/ but sure, feel free to check other VPNs like AirVPN and OVPN. Source: over 2 years ago
  • VPN for China
    Lantern - https://getlantern.org/ (different technology compared to VPNs, therefore sometimes works when VPNs don't work). Source: over 2 years ago
  • Secure Internet Access
    For those of you who may need secure internet access - https://getlantern.org. Source: about 3 years ago
  • What VPN works best in China as of September 2021
    Another good choice would be lantern with single click activation. It's reliable most of the times except the big days. Source: over 3 years ago

Oso mentions (7)

  • How We Think About Securing Express.js APIs in 2024
    When the third case starts popping up, that's when an authorization provider like Oso or Permit.io starts to sound appealing. Centralized, easily readable authorization logic combined with easy queries for "what users are allowed to perform this action?" sounds great when your authorization logic starts to get a bit too complex. And we're finding a few cases where our authorization logic is getting too hard to... - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Solution for ReBAC authz using attributes?
    I know of warrant.dev, osohq.com, and Ory Keto but I don't see that these evaluate based on attributes. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Authorization Framework + Data Filtering
    Oso supports applying authorization logic at the ORM layer so that you can efficiently authorize entire data sets. For example, suppose you have millions of posts in a social media application created by thousands of users, and regular users are only authorized to view posts from their friends. It would be inefficient to fetch all of the posts and authorize them one by one. It would be much more efficient to... Source: almost 4 years ago
  • Node Authorization Framework
    Oso's Node library now provides a configuration-based approach to adding role-based access control (RBAC) to your application. This new library speeds up the time it takes to build fine-grained permissions using roles and related patterns. Here are the docs + quickstart. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • AuthZ: Carta’s highly scalable permissions system
    > It's crazy this still is part of the stack where there are no great solutions. Seems like a few others have come to the same conclusion :) We're working on this at Oso (https://osohq.com) - I'm the CTO. Oso is an open source framework for authorization. Policies can reference application directly, so any authorization decisions can be made dynamically based on the data. And your data doesn't need to leave your... - Source: Hacker News / almost 4 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Lantern and Oso, you can also consider the following products

Tor Browser - Tor is free software for enabling anonymous communication.

authzed - The platform to store, compute, and validate app permissions

Hotspot Shield - Hotspot Shield is a software application developed by AnchorFree, Inc.

Cerbos - Cerbos helps teams separate their authorization process from their core application code, making their authorization system more scalable, more secure and easier to change as the application evolves.

Psiphon - Psiphon is circumvention software for Windows and Mobile platforms that provides uncensored access to Internet content. Read more about Psiphon.

Aserto - Fine-grained, scalable authorization in minutes