Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Laserfiche VS Apache Flink

Compare Laserfiche VS Apache Flink and see what are their differences

Laserfiche logo Laserfiche

Laserfiche offers powerful document management software solutions that are easy to implement and easy to use.

Apache Flink logo Apache Flink

Flink is a streaming dataflow engine that provides data distribution, communication, and fault tolerance for distributed computations.
  • Laserfiche Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-19
  • Apache Flink Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-03

Laserfiche videos

What Can Laserfiche Do?

More videos:

  • Review - Laserfiche Basics
  • Review - Laserfiche Empower 2012 - In Review

Apache Flink videos

GOTO 2019 • Introduction to Stateful Stream Processing with Apache Flink • Robert Metzger

More videos:

  • Tutorial - Apache Flink Tutorial | Flink vs Spark | Real Time Analytics Using Flink | Apache Flink Training
  • Tutorial - How to build a modern stream processor: The science behind Apache Flink - Stefan Richter

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Laserfiche and Apache Flink)
Project Management
100 100%
0% 0
Big Data
0 0%
100% 100
BPM
100 100%
0% 0
Stream Processing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Laserfiche and Apache Flink. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Flink seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 30 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Laserfiche mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Laserfiche yet. Tracking of Laserfiche recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Apache Flink mentions (30)

  • Show HN: Restate, low-latency durable workflows for JavaScript/Java, in Rust
    Restate is built as a sharded replicated state machine similar to how TiKV (https://tikv.org/), Kudu (https://kudu.apache.org/kudu.pdf) or CockroachDB (https://github.com/cockroachdb/cockroach) since it makes it possible to tune the system more easily for different deployment scenarios (on-prem, cloud, cost-effective blob storage). Moreover, it allows for some other cool things like seamlessly moving from one log... - Source: Hacker News / 22 days ago
  • Array Expansion in Flink SQL
    I’ve recently started my journey with Apache Flink. As I learn certain concepts, I’d like to share them. One such "learning" is the expansion of array type columns in Flink SQL. Having used ksqlDB in a previous life, I was looking for functionality similar to the EXPLODE function to "flatten" a collection type column into a row per element of the collection. Because Flink SQL is ANSI compliant, it’s no surprise... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Show HN: An SQS Alternative on Postgres
    You should let the Apache Flink team know, they mention exactly-once processing on their home page (under "correctness guarantees") and in their list of features. [0] https://flink.apache.org/ [1] https://flink.apache.org/what-is-flink/flink-applications/#building-blocks-for-streaming-applications. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • Top 10 Common Data Engineers and Scientists Pain Points in 2024
    Data scientists often prefer Python for its simplicity and powerful libraries like Pandas or SciPy. However, many real-time data processing tools are Java-based. Take the example of Kafka, Flink, or Spark streaming. While these tools have their Python API/wrapper libraries, they introduce increased latency, and data scientists need to manage dependencies for both Python and JVM environments. For example,... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Choosing Between a Streaming Database and a Stream Processing Framework in Python
    Other stream processing engines (such as Flink and Spark Streaming) provide SQL interfaces too, but the key difference is a streaming database has its storage. Stream processing engines require a dedicated database to store input and output data. On the other hand, streaming databases utilize cloud-native storage to maintain materialized views and states, allowing data replication and independent storage scaling. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Laserfiche and Apache Flink, you can also consider the following products

Kissflow - Kissflow is a workflow tool & business process workflow management software to automate your workflow process. Rated #1 cloud workflow software in Google Apps Marketplace.

Apache Spark - Apache Spark is an engine for big data processing, with built-in modules for streaming, SQL, machine learning and graph processing.

Nintex - Cloud-based digital workflow management automation platform

Amazon Kinesis - Amazon Kinesis services make it easy to work with real-time streaming data in the AWS cloud.

ProcessMaker - ProcessMaker is an easy to use BPM and workflow software solution. It is used to design, automate, and deploy business processes of any kind.

Spring Framework - The Spring Framework provides a comprehensive programming and configuration model for modern Java-based enterprise applications - on any kind of deployment platform.