Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Lazydocker VS Cockpit Project

Compare Lazydocker VS Cockpit Project and see what are their differences

craftlands.host
Powerful, fast, and budget-friendly game server hosting for Minecraft, Rust and more. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Lazydocker logo Lazydocker

A simple terminal UI for docker and docker-compose, written in Go with the gocui library.

Cockpit Project logo Cockpit Project

Makes it easy to administer Linux servers via a web browser.
  • Lazydocker Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-26
  • Cockpit Project Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-22

Lazydocker features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Lazydocker provides a simple and intuitive TUI (text user interface) that simplifies the process of managing Docker containers, images, volumes, and networks, making it accessible even for those less familiar with Docker CLI.
  • Comprehensive Management
    It offers a comprehensive view of all docker resources, allowing for easy monitoring and managing of containers, images, volumes, and networks from a single interface.
  • Quick Navigation
    Users can swiftly navigate between different docker objects and perform actions like stopping, starting, or removing containers without remembering complex commands.
  • Log Inspection
    Lazydocker allows users to easily inspect logs directly from the interface, helping quickly diagnose and address issues with containers.
  • Ease of Installation
    Lazydocker is easy to install and set up, providing straightforward instructions to get started quickly without complicated configurations.

Possible disadvantages of Lazydocker

  • Limited Functionality
    While Lazydocker covers basic functions well, it might lack some advanced features available in native Docker CLI or other comprehensive Docker management tools.
  • TUI Limitations
    As a Terminal User Interface application, it might not be as visually appealing or as detailed as GUI-based tools, potentially impacting the user experience for some users.
  • Dependency on Terminal
    Since Lazydocker is a TUI application, it requires a terminal to operate, which might not be ideal for users who prefer standalone GUI applications.
  • Not Ideal for Large Scale
    Lazydocker might not be the best tool for managing large-scale docker environments or complex multi-host setups, where more robust management and orchestration tools like Kubernetes might be more appropriate.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly interface, new users with no prior experience with terminal applications may take some time to get accustomed to its interface and navigation.

Cockpit Project features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Cockpit provides a web-based user interface that simplifies server management tasks. It is intuitive and easy to use, even for those who may not have deep system administration experience.
  • Real-Time Monitoring
    Cockpit offers real-time monitoring of system resources and performance. This allows administrators to quickly identify and address potential issues as they arise.
  • Multi-Server Management
    With Cockpit, users can manage multiple servers from a single dashboard. This is particularly useful for administrators who manage complex environments with numerous servers.
  • Linux Integration
    Cockpit is well-integrated with Linux systems and supports various distributions like Fedora, RHEL, CentOS, and Ubuntu. It takes advantage of existing system APIs and commands, making it very efficient.
  • Lightweight
    Cockpit is lightweight and does not consume significant system resources. It runs only on demand, minimizing its impact on the server.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source project, Cockpit allows customization and community contributions. This leads to continuous improvement and the addition of new features.

Possible disadvantages of Cockpit Project

  • Limited Advanced Features
    Cockpit may lack some advanced features and functionalities that are available in more comprehensive server management tools. This might be a limitation for larger enterprises with complex needs.
  • Web-Based Interface
    While the web-based interface is a pro for ease of use, it might be seen as a con in environments where command-line interface (CLI) is preferred for its speed and flexibility.
  • Security Concerns
    As a web-based tool, Cockpit might pose security concerns, especially if it is exposed to the internet. It is pivotal to secure the Cockpit service properly and adhere to best practices for web security.
  • Dependent on Systemd
    Cockpit relies heavily on systemd for its operations. This can be a limitation for users who prefer or are required to use alternative init systems.
  • Feature Parity
    Compared to other dedicated management solutions, Cockpit might not offer feature parity. Users may miss certain specialized functionality found in more targeted tools.

Lazydocker videos

+ Add

LazyDocker is a user-riendly terminal GUI for Docker

More videos:

  • Demo - Lazydocker. Terminal UI for Docker and Docker-Compose. Demo.

Cockpit Project videos

No Cockpit Project videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Lazydocker and Cockpit Project)

Lazydocker

Cockpit Project

DevOps Tools
100 100%
DevOps Tools
0% 0
Control Panels
0 0%
Control Panels
100% 100
Developer Tools
100 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0
Hosting
0 0%
Hosting
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Lazydocker and Cockpit Project. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Lazydocker and Cockpit Project

Lazydocker Reviews

We have no reviews of Lazydocker yet.
Be the first one to post

Cockpit Project Reviews

Explore Top VestaCP Alternative: Find the Perfect Control Panel for Your Hosting Needs
Cockpit serves as a superb resource for novice sysadmins, providing them with a seamless way to carry out fundamental tasks such as storage management, journal inspection, and service initiation or cessation. Services launched via Cockpit can also be halted using the terminal, while errors encountered in the terminal can be monitored through the Cockpit journal interface.
Source: cyberpanel.net
6 cPanel Alternatives
Cockpit is designed to manage small and medium-sized business networks more so than web applications. It’s more suitable for advanced users familiar with the terminal. Backed by Red Hat, the administration tool has stable, updated integrations for RAID backup configurations, virtualization, and file sharing.
Source: www.inmotionhosting.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Cockpit Project should be more popular than Lazydocker. It has been mentiond 168 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Lazydocker mentions (28)

  • Docker Management Is Evolving These 8 Tools Made My Life Easier
    Lazydocker GitHub — TUI to manage containers without rage. - Source: dev.to / 25 days ago
  • LazyJournal: A Terminal User Interface for Logs
    LazyJournal is a terminal user interface (TUI) written in Go, designed for easy analysis of system and application logs. It is inspired by tools like lazydocker and lazygit, providing interactive access to search, view, and filter logs from various sources in the local system. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Switching Fully to Neovim
    Additionally, I integrate several CLI tools into my work flow, such as lazygit for streamlined Git operations, yazi as a terminal file manager, tmux for session management, and lazydocker for handling Docker containers efficiently. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • 5 Awesome Docker Tools To Make Your Life Easier
    Lazy Docker is a terminal UI for Docker and Docker Compose that makes managing containers a breeze. Instead of having to remember and type out long Docker commands, you get an interactive interface where everything is just a keypress away. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Ask HN: Interesting TUIs (text user interfaces), maybe forgotten ones?
    Lazydocker [0] is by the same author as lazygit. I'm thoroughly familiar with the Docker CLI, but sometimes it's just easier to use a GUI or TUI for some things. In particular, I use lazydocker for cleaning up volumes or images that may no longer be needed. [0] https://github.com/jesseduffield/lazydocker. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
View more

Cockpit Project mentions (168)

  • KDE is finally getting a native virtual machine manager called "Karton"
    Do we really need another GUI for kvm/qemu? I was thinking that https://cockpit-project.org cover the idea to develop something like Karton, but who am I to think so =). - Source: Hacker News / 2 days ago
  • The GUI Way of Using Linux (How To Use Cockpit on CentOS)
    You can get the info about cockpit on the official website. But, the most convenient way to configure it is here in this blog. So, without wasting any second, let’s start with the practical. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • OS question for new build DIY Nas
    I would personally prefer a hypervisor as the base OS and VMs for every role, like separate VM for NAS functionality, separate VM for media, etc. As per hypervisor, I would recommend taking a look at Proxmox as a good enough Linux-based and low-resource demanding hypervisor. Another Linux option would be pure KVM on any Linux distro you like + Cockpit and Cockpit machines (https://cockpit-project.org/) to manage VMs. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Looking for a webinterface to controll server/nas/linux box
    See title, and I prefer a interface thats opensource. I want to setup my nas system, controll services and maybe do terminal work aswell. Ive experimented with cockpit ( https://cockpit-project.org/ ) wondered if there are better or different tools out there. They have plugins I like but also mis. No minecraft stuff, no vm controll (They dropper docker for something else) Redhat ?!? Source: over 1 year ago
  • How to manage local logs
    No problem, journald is in fact structured logging and it provides all you need to do efficient searching, correlation and archival. There is actually a nice web interface too as part of cockpit-project.org although it is nothing like Kibana of course. Source: almost 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Lazydocker and Cockpit Project, you can also consider the following products

Portainer - Simple management UI for Docker

Webmin - Webmin is a web-based interface for system administration for Unix.

lazygit - Simple terminal UI for git commands.

CyberPanel - CyberPanel is web hosting control which is based on OpenLiteSpeed.

DockStation - DockStation is a developer-centric application for managing projects based on Docker.

cPanel - With its first-class support and rich feature set, cPanel & WHM has been the web hosting industry's most reliable, intuitive control panel since 1997.

Loading...