Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

LiteSpeed Web Server VS Azure Load Balancer

Compare LiteSpeed Web Server VS Azure Load Balancer and see what are their differences

LiteSpeed Web Server logo LiteSpeed Web Server

LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) is a high-performance Apache drop-in replacement.

Azure Load Balancer logo Azure Load Balancer

Azure Load Balancer delivers high availability and network performance to the applications.
  • LiteSpeed Web Server Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-31
  • Azure Load Balancer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-13

LiteSpeed Web Server videos

What Is LiteSpeed Web Server?

More videos:

  • Review - What Is LiteSpeed Web Server?

Azure Load Balancer videos

Azure Networking - #14 - Azure Load Balancer

More videos:

  • Review - Azure Load Balancer Deep Dive
  • Tutorial - Azure Load Balancer Tutorial

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to LiteSpeed Web Server and Azure Load Balancer)
Web And Application Servers
Web Servers
84 84%
16% 16
Application Server
100 100%
0% 0
Load Balancer / Reverse Proxy

User comments

Share your experience with using LiteSpeed Web Server and Azure Load Balancer. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare LiteSpeed Web Server and Azure Load Balancer

LiteSpeed Web Server Reviews

Litespeed vs Nginx vs Apache: Web Server Showdown
LiteSpeed Web Server, abbreviated as LSWS, is almost a newcomer to the webserver ‘scene’. It has gained a huge, perhaps even cult-like following in the last few years among web hosting companies due to its efficiency. With its streamlined architecture, companies running LiteSpeed Web Server could (theoretically) double the maximum capacity of websites their servers, assuming...
Source: chemicloud.com
Top Linux Web Servers: Pros and Cons
LiteSpeed comes in two versions: a free one known as OpenLiteSpeed and a paid enterprise version with extended functionality.
Source: bigstep.com
Alternative web servers compared: Lighttpd, Nginx, LiteSpeed and Zeus
Brief info: LiteSpeed is a commercial web server designed specifically for large websites. One of LiteSpeed’s advantages is that it can read Apache configurations directly which makes it easy to integrate with existing products to replace Apache. The server is lightweight and as the name implies very fast.
Source: www.pingdom.com

Azure Load Balancer Reviews

We have no reviews of Azure Load Balancer yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Azure Load Balancer seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

LiteSpeed Web Server mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of LiteSpeed Web Server yet. Tracking of LiteSpeed Web Server recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Azure Load Balancer mentions (1)

  • Websites and services crashing has been an issue for a long time.
    That's why there are load balancers and many cloud offerings let you scale on demand. Source: about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing LiteSpeed Web Server and Azure Load Balancer, you can also consider the following products

Apache Tomcat - An open source software implementation of the Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages technologies

nginx - A high performance free open source web server powering busiest sites on the Internet.

Microsoft IIS - Internet Information Services is a web server for Microsoft Windows

AWS Elastic Load Balancing - Amazon ELB automatically distributes incoming application traffic across multiple Amazon EC2 instances in the cloud.

Apache HTTP Server - Apache httpd has been the most popular web server on the Internet since April 1996

Azure Traffic Manager - Microsoft Azure Traffic Manager allows you to control the distribution of user traffic for service endpoints in different datacenters.