Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Live.js VS Fire.app

Compare Live.js VS Fire.app and see what are their differences

Live.js logo Live.js

Live. js. one script closer to designing in the browser. Say goodbye to Alt-Tab. Live.

Fire.app logo Fire.app

Fire.app is a menu bar only app for dead easy HTML prototyping.
  • Live.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-29
  • Fire.app Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-12-18

Live.js features and specs

  • Automatic Reload
    Live.js automatically reloads web pages whenever HTML, CSS, or JavaScript files are modified, which enhances developer productivity by immediately reflecting changes without manual refreshing.
  • Easy Setup
    The setup process for Live.js is straightforward, requiring minimal configuration. Developers only need to include a single script tag to start using it.
  • No Build Tools Required
    Live.js does not require any build tools or server environment, making it a lightweight option for quickly setting up live reload functionality without the complexity of integrating with other toolchains.
  • Real-time Preview
    Provides real-time preview of changes, which is beneficial for rapid prototyping and design iterations, improving the workflow for front-end developers.

Possible disadvantages of Live.js

  • Limited Feature Set
    Live.js offers basic functionality focused mainly on live reloading. It may not cover more advanced use cases or features that comprehensive development tools provide.
  • Inefficient for Large Projects
    For larger projects with many files, Live.js can become inefficient as it reloads the entire page, which might interrupt development flow and increase wait times.
  • Not Suitable for Production
    Live.js is meant for development environments and should not be used in production as it can expose internal file structures and is not optimized for performance.
  • No Customization
    Offers little to no options for customization or configuration, which might be a drawback for developers who need more control over the development environment behavior.

Fire.app features and specs

  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    Fire.app is designed to work on multiple operating systems including Windows, macOS, and Linux, allowing users to use the software regardless of their platform preference.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The application features a clean and intuitive interface, making it easy for beginners to navigate and for experienced users to perform tasks efficiently.
  • Real-time Updates
    Fire.app provides real-time updates and notifications, keeping users informed of any changes or activities that require attention immediately.
  • Integration Capabilities
    The app supports integration with various popular tools and services, enhancing its functionality and allowing users to incorporate it seamlessly into their existing workflows.

Possible disadvantages of Fire.app

  • Limited Features
    Some users may find that Fire.app lacks advanced features or customization options that are available in other similar applications.
  • Performance Issues
    There have been reports of occasional performance lags or slowdowns, particularly when running the app on devices with lower specifications.
  • Steep Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While the basic interface is user-friendly, some of the more advanced functions can be difficult to master and might require additional time or resources to learn.
  • Limited Support
    Users have indicated that support for troubleshooting problems can be limited, making it challenging to resolve issues quickly when they arise.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Live.js and Fire.app)
Image Optimisation
46 46%
54% 54
Developer Tools
43 43%
57% 57
Design Tools
35 35%
65% 65
Browser Testing
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Live.js and Fire.app. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Live.js seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Live.js mentions (3)

  • Can I skip the system checks?
    There's a crusty old script out there called Live.js. IIRC it sends a request to the server every second or so and if it detects a different content-length header it reloads the page. It's like a poor man's version of hot reloading. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Are there any lesser-known tools you use a lot in your work?
    Live.js - automatically refreshes the page when we edit the sources. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Is there a way to see your webpage while your edit it?
    Livejs (not tested it myself) looks like what your are looking for. Source: about 3 years ago

Fire.app mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Fire.app yet. Tracking of Fire.app recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Live.js and Fire.app, you can also consider the following products

CodeKit - CodeKit allows you to optimize the performance of your website by automatically and efficiently compiling a variety of popular languages.

Prepros - Compile Less, Sass, Scss, Stylus, Jade, Coffeescript, Haml and Markdown with live browser refresh.

LiveReload - LiveReload 2 proudly presents… The Web Developer Wonderland. (a happy land where browsers don't need a Refresh button). CSS edits and image changes apply live. CoffeeScript, SASS, LESS and others just work.

Scout-App - Process Sass files into CSS without any knowledge of the command line.

Browsersync - Browsersync makes your tweaking and testing faster by synchronising file changes and interactions...

SiteFlow - The life-saver app for web developers !