Haha, I'm glad! I'm a frontend dev and, unfortunately, usually just grab a loading animation off of https://loading.io/. Now I kinda wish I'd thought to go look at how your animation is done - is it a gif under the hood, or is it a cool canvas thing? Too late now, since generation is disabled, but maybe I'll take a look in a few days when it's back up. :). Source: about 1 year ago

I used this as a base and used this for the loading animation. Source: about 1 year ago

Loading.io usage is similar to Animista's in that no additional package is required to get started. You'd simply go to their website, choose a preferred loader, customize as desired, and then export. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

CSS Loaders Library with free CSS loaders for you to pick from. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

This site has a bunch of neat copy/paste-able CSS loading spinners you can use if you can't do it yourself by hand: https://loading.io/ (although beware that this site makes Firefox insta-crash when I try to open it??? Chrome is fine though, huh). Source: over 2 years ago

[code]Installed Packages Name : w3m-img Version : 0.5.3 Release : 57.git20220429.fc37 Architecture : x86_64 Size : 32 k Source : w3m-0.5.3-57.git20220429.fc37.src.rpm Repository : @System From repo : fedora Summary : Helper program to display the inline images for w3m URL : http://w3m.sourceforge.net/ License : MIT and UCD Description : w3m-img package... Source: over 1 year ago

You should check w3m http://w3m.sourceforge.net/. Source: almost 2 years ago

Try http://w3m.sourceforge.net some day. :). Source: about 2 years ago

Does anyone have a chart/rundown of why we should choose links/lynx/w3m? The old main page calls links / lynx "neighbors"... http://w3m.sourceforge.net/ I use links (gentoo user here), but I do not really see a huge difference between the three. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

Lynx is pretty good, but I personally like w3m. Source: over 2 years ago