Logseq Reviews

Reviewable Reviews

Logseq mentions (281)

• Enlightenmentware

  Nice! I used https://wiki.systemcrafters.net/emacs/org-roam/ for a while but switched to LogSeq (https://logseq.com/) because org-roam was buggy. I like working with LogSeq, but even after a couple of years of using it, I’m not convinced by the Zettelkasten method. Maybe I’m doing it wrong! - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago

• Notes on Emacs Org Mode

  Sorry, but _what exactly_ «it seems to do» from your point of view? My «second brain» now is almost 300Mb of text, pictures, sound files, PDF and other stuff. As I already mentioned, it contains tables, mathematical formulae, sheet music, cross-references, code samples, UML diagrams and graphs in Graphviz format. It is versioned, indexed by local search engine, analyzed by AI assistant and shared between many... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

• Why I Like Obsidian

  Obsidian is great. For those looking for an open source alternative (or don't want to pay the Obsidian fees for professional usage) check out Logseq: https://logseq.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

• Obsidian 1.5 Desktop (Public)

  For an opensource alternative to Obsidian checkout Logseq (1). I spent a while thinking obsidian was opensource out of my own ignorance and was disappointed when I learned it was not. 1: https://logseq.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

• How do you track your daily tasks?

  I use logseq to keep journal of my daily work. Source: 7 months ago

Reviewable mentions (21)

• A list of SaaS, PaaS and IaaS offerings that have free tiers of interest to devops and infradev

  Reviewable.io — Code review for GitHub repositories, free for public or personal repos. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago

• The GitHub for Code Review UI Needs Serious Innovation

  Yep, I agree! I work at, and use, Reviewable (https://reviewable.io) and we're the best way to review code on GitHub because we've focused on making the whole process better at every step. We've improved diffing, not only for large files (we support larger files than GitHub does) but also for understanding that diff. Have you ever reviewed a PR twice, but the second time around all your comments are gone and you... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago

• Software Engineering at Google

  Https://reviewable.io is the earliest full-powered Critique alternative for GitHub. It supports some cool things Critique doesn't/didn't, such as reviewing multi-commit branches (also across history-rewriting force-push cleanups), and indicating exactly the nature of your comment (just FYI, or you want this to be changed before you'll give your approval). (I was an intern in the initial making of Critique, and... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago

• Codereview: Should the Go project stop importing GitHub PRs?

  The linux kernel, which is open source and does want contributors, is doing more-or-less just fine with an email-based PR and review flow. If it's an open source project, it should be using an open source review platform that allows improvements and specialization of the code hosting too. Using github, where the review tools are bad and can't be improved by an outsider, is a slap in the face to open source.... - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago

• Show HN: Visibly – More Collaborative and Efficient Code Reviews on GitHub

  >See reviewer presence so that you can see if someone is already reviewing and avoid unnecessary pings. >Visibly values privacy and security above all else These two things seem squarely at odds. Personally, I don't want my code review tool announcing to developers when I'm looking at their PR. The fact that it's a Chrome extension would also be a big blocker for me. I run a dev team, and I wouldn't... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago