Based on our record, Chocolatey seems to be a lot more popular than LXD. While we know about 252 links to Chocolatey, we've tracked only 9 mentions of LXD. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Linux containers project. Foreshadowing of this move at https://linuxcontainers.org/lxd/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
The expected changes are: - https://github.com/lxc/lxd will now become https://github.com/canonical/lxd - https://linuxcontainers.org/lxd will disappear and be replaced with a mention directing users to https://ubuntu.com/lxd - The LXD YouTube channel will be handed over to the Canonical team - The LXD section on the LinuxContainers community forum will slowly Be sunset in favor of the Ubuntu Discourse forum... Source: about 1 year ago
Hello community, It seems LXC images for arm7l/armhf are no longer available, not from the official Turris mirror nor from LinuxContainers.org (https://linuxcontainers.org/lxd/). Any solution or alternative for people like me heavily relying on the Turris Omnia to run LXC containers? Thanks. Source: about 1 year ago
Any distribution stable enough and LXD https://linuxcontainers.org/lxd/ for containers and VMs. Source: over 1 year ago
This has been really stable, and has worked pretty well for me. I deploy the applications to a set of LXD containers (read: lightweight Linux VMs) on Proxmox, a free and open-source hypervisor with an excellent management interface. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
Chocolatey Windows software management solution, we use this for installing Python and Deno. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Authenticating with Kyma is a (in my opinion) unnecessary challenge as it leverages the OIDC-login plugin for kubectl. You find a description of the setup here. This works fine when on a Mac but can give you some headaches on a Windows and on Linux machine especially when combined with restrictive setups in corporate environments. For Windows I can only recommend installing krew via chocolatey and then install the... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
On a Windows machine, you can use Chocolatey by running the command. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
I've used WSL2 and GHC/Nix--worked without any issues. However, there is Chocolatey: https://chocolatey.org/. Source: 7 months ago
For OSX there is homebrew or pyenv (pyenv is another solution on Linux). As pyenv compiles from source it will require setting up XCode (the Apple IDE) tools to support this which can be pretty bulky. Windows users have chocolatey but the issue there is it works off the binaries. That means it won't have the latest security release available since those are source only. Conda is also another solution which can be... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
runc - CLI tool for spawning and running containers according to the OCI specification - opencontainers/runc
Ninite - Ninite is the easiest way to install software.
Crane - Crane is a docker image builder to approach light-weight ML users who want to expand a container image with custom apt/conda/pip packages without writing any Dockerfile.
Scoop - A command-line installer for Windows
Podman - Simple debugging tool for pods and images
Homebrew - The missing package manager for macOS