Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

ManyBox VS hat.sh

Compare ManyBox VS hat.sh and see what are their differences

TimeLake.io
Improve team performance continuously with time tracking automation. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

ManyBox logo ManyBox

Your sensitive data saved in your pocket

hat.sh logo hat.sh

Free, fast, secure and serverless file encryption
  • ManyBox Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-02-25
  • hat.sh Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-10

ManyBox features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

hat.sh features and specs

  • Simplicity
    Hat.sh offers a straightforward and user-friendly interface that makes encryption and decryption accessible to users without requiring advanced technical knowledge.
  • Portability
    The application is web-based and can be accessed from any device with a web browser, allowing for easy file encryption and decryption on the go.
  • Open Source
    Hat.sh publishes its source code on GitHub, allowing transparency and community auditing, which enhances trust and security for users.
  • No Account Required
    Users do not need to create an account or provide personal information, thus minimizing concerns about privacy and data misuse.
  • Encryption Standards
    Utilizes AES-256-GCM encryption, a highly secure and respected standard, ensuring robust protection for the files.

Possible disadvantages of hat.sh

  • Internet Dependency
    Being a web-based tool, it requires a stable internet connection for access, which limits its usability in offline scenarios.
  • Limited Features
    Compared to dedicated encryption software, Hat.sh offers fewer features and customization options, potentially limiting its use for advanced users with specific needs.
  • Browser-Based Security
    As a browser-based tool, security is partly dependent on the browser and device used, which may introduce vulnerabilities beyond the control of the Hat.sh platform itself.
  • File Size Limitations
    Web-based encryption tools often have limitations on the size of files they can handle efficiently, which may be a constraint for users needing to encrypt very large files.
  • Dependence on JavaScript
    Since the tool operates on JavaScript, any security vulnerabilities in the browser's JavaScript engine could potentially impact the safety of the encryption process.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to ManyBox and hat.sh)

ManyBox

hat.sh

Cloud Storage
26 26%
Cloud Storage
74% 74
Facebook Tools
100 100%
Facebook Tools
0% 0
Security & Privacy
0 0%
Security & Privacy
100% 100
Delete Facebook
100 100%
Delete Facebook
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using ManyBox and hat.sh. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, hat.sh seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 22 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

ManyBox mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of ManyBox yet. Tracking of ManyBox recommendations started around Mar 2021.

hat.sh mentions (22)

  • Simplest way to back up Bitwarden
    BTW you can use hat.sh website to encrypt a file with the browser on any device including phone (to decrypt you will have to visit the website) and the website runs locally on your browser so its not sending the file to any server. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Does xchacha not follow an open standard?
    Hey so when looking at xchacha as it seems to be getting more and more popular in terms of adoption for securing files/messages etc. I noticed that when experimenting and testing file encryption with applications like dexios picocrypt and hat.sh that none of the files could be read/understood by other applications. While this doesn't happen with alot of other apps/algos likes aes afaik. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Alternative to Encrypto
    I usually use hat.sh in the browser. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Thoughts on xchacha vs aes?
    Hey so I see that the website recommends picocrypt which uses xchacha20 and its made me go on a little bit of a rabbit hole of xchacha and how it compares to aes. I've also noticed that xchacha is getting adopted very quickly; companies like google; nordpass etc are using it over aes. Does this mean aes is on its way out? Why would a person/company move a lot of their systems to this honestly brand new algorythm... Source: about 2 years ago
  • How do I make sure that word document is encrypted and can safely store sensitive data.
    I second this comment. https://hat.sh is probably the easiest. Especially if you are not able/allowed to install apps on your device. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing ManyBox and hat.sh, you can also consider the following products

Tresorit - Encrypted cloud storage for your confidential files. Using Tresorit, files are encrypted before being uploaded to the cloud. Start encrypting files for free.

Cryptomator - When it comes to saving your files on a cloud server, it is important to ensure the security of those files. Keeping your delicate files out of the wrong hands can save you a lot of time and hassle. Read more about Cryptomator.

Block Photos - Your photo album decentralized and encrypted in the cloud.

Cryptee - Cryptee is a safety and privacy focused, encrypted and cross-platform personal data storage service. You can write personal documents, notes, journals, store photos and all sorts of other files.

VeraCrypt - VeraCrypt is a free open source disk encryption software for Windows, Mac OSX and Linux.

SocialVault - Decentralized, encrypted storage and browser for your Facebook data.

Loading...