Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Microsoft SQL Server Compact VS Protobuf

Compare Microsoft SQL Server Compact VS Protobuf and see what are their differences

Microsoft SQL Server Compact logo Microsoft SQL Server Compact

Bring Microsoft SQL Server 2017 to the platform of your choice. Use SQL Server 2017 on Windows, Linux, and Docker containers.

Protobuf logo Protobuf

Protocol buffers are a language-neutral, platform-neutral extensible mechanism for serializing structured data.
  • Microsoft SQL Server Compact Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-26
  • Protobuf Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-29

Microsoft SQL Server Compact videos

No Microsoft SQL Server Compact videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Protobuf videos

StreamBerry, part 2 : introduction to Google ProtoBuf

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Microsoft SQL Server Compact and Protobuf)
Databases
100 100%
0% 0
Configuration Management
0 0%
100% 100
NoSQL Databases
100 100%
0% 0
Mobile Apps
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Microsoft SQL Server Compact and Protobuf. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Protobuf seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 82 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Microsoft SQL Server Compact mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Microsoft SQL Server Compact yet. Tracking of Microsoft SQL Server Compact recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Protobuf mentions (82)

  • Developing games on and for Mac and Linux
    Protocol Buffers: https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Adding Codable conformance to Union with Metaprogramming
    ProtocolBuffers’ OneOf message addresses the case of having a message with many fields where at most one field will be set at the same time. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Logcat is awful. What would you improve?
    That's definitely the bigger thing. I think something like Protocol Buffers (Protobuf) is what you're looking for there. Output the data and consume it by something that can handle the analysis. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Bitcoin is the "narrow waist" of internet-based value
    These protocols prevent an O(N x M) explosion of code that have to solve for many cases. For example, since JSON is an almost ubiquitous format for wire transfer (although other things do exist like protobufs), if I had N data formats that I want to serialize, I only need to write N serializers/deserializers (SerDes). If there was no such narrow waist and there were M alternatives to JSON in wide usage, I would... Source: over 1 year ago
  • Understanding gRPC Concepts, Use Cases & Best Practices
    gRPC uses protocol buffers (it is an open source message format) as the default method of communication between client and server. Also, gRPC uses HTTP/ 2 as the default protocol. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Microsoft SQL Server Compact and Protobuf, you can also consider the following products

CompactView - Viewer for Microsoft® SQL Server® CE database files (sdf)

gRPC - Application and Data, Languages & Frameworks, Remote Procedure Call (RPC), and Service Discovery

ObjectBox - ObjectBox empower edge computing with an edge device database and synchronization solution for Mobile & IoT. Store and sync data from edge to cloud.

Messagepack - An efficient binary serialization format.

Realm.io - Realm is a mobile platform and a replacement for SQLite & Core Data. Build offline-first, reactive mobile experiences using simple data sync.

TOML - TOML - Tom's Obvious, Minimal Language