Based on our record, Google Scholar should be more popular than Miro. It has been mentiond 999 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
To fix this, I added a digital whiteboard to my workflow, and this is phenomenal. You can use any digital whiteboard, such as https://www.figma.com/figjam/, https://excalidraw.com/, https://miro.com/, or https://obsidian.md/canvas. My workflow generally goes like:. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
Miro - Scalable, secure, cross-device, and enterprise-ready collaboration whiteboard for distributed teams. With a freemium plan. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
For your project, you actually might have a better time using Miro. I use Miro for doing pretty much any kind of presentation of grammar for my classes (I'm a language teacher) and love the ease and flexibility with which you can organise neat looking flow charts. Source: 7 months ago
Getting together around a whiteboard is one of the most productive ways for people to collaborate in a room together. Miro recreates that easy collaboration for remote teams with its multiplayer online whiteboards. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
We also had other tools in use, such as Miro. This tool was primarily used for visualizing certain process flows, like document change approval processes. Or at some point, we considered using boards in Asana because non-delivery processes were managed in that tool. However, when we contemplated the move to Asana, I decided to explore other potential tools. After reading many articles and conducting some research,... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
A few may know, that google scholar(https://scholar.google.com/) does not offer a feature for arranging the search results based on the number of citations. Several years ago, one developer published a Python code (https://github.com/WittmannF/sort-google-scholar) to handle this. I had been inspired by his work, but I wanted to show the list of... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
To that point, https://scholar.google.com/ is still useful. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
1) find the doi number [1a][1b] 2) find sources that cite the doi number -> google scholar[2][3] 3) filter for 'github' ----- [1a]resolve a doi name : https://dx.doi.org/ [1b]find a doi number : https://answers.lib.iup.edu/faq/31945 [2] : https://scholar.google.com/ [3] : google with "site:http://doi.org/" [4] : finding a doi in document page :... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
Half of those are about science, during my Ph.D., I was told to use scholar.google.com, which works great as far as I can tell. Couple it to sci-hub and you get all the scientific literature you need. Source: 7 months ago
Scholar.google.com exists also which is what you use for studies. Source: 7 months ago
Mural - MURAL is a visual collaboration workspace for modern teams.
PubMed.gov - PubMed comprises more than 29 million citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. Citations may include links to full-text content from PubMed Central and publisher web sites.
Trello - Infinitely flexible. Incredibly easy to use. Great mobile apps. It's free. Trello keeps track of everything, from the big picture to the minute details.
SCI-HUB - It provides mass and public access to tens of millions of research papers
Figma - Team-based interface design, Figma lets you collaborate on designs in real time.
Leap Motion - Reach into the future of virtual and augmented reality with the most advanced hand tracking on Earth, used by over 300,000 developers worldwide.