Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

MIT License VS Google Scholar

Compare MIT License VS Google Scholar and see what are their differences

MIT License logo MIT License

A license from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Google Scholar logo Google Scholar

Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text of scholarly...
  • MIT License Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-03
  • Google Scholar Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-07

MIT License videos

MIT License-Good or Bad? What MIT Licence means? Can MIT license be used commercially? #mit #tsg

Google Scholar videos

How to do a literature review using Google Scholar

More videos:

  • Tutorial - How To Use Google Scholar | Writing A Literature Review
  • Tutorial - How to use Google Scholar to find journal articles | Essay Tips

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to MIT License and Google Scholar)
Productivity
100 100%
0% 0
Digital Whiteboard
0 0%
100% 100
Code Collaboration
100 100%
0% 0
Research Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using MIT License and Google Scholar. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Google Scholar seems to be a lot more popular than MIT License. While we know about 999 links to Google Scholar, we've tracked only 4 mentions of MIT License. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

MIT License mentions (4)

  • Show HN: Stanchion – Column-oriented tables in SQLite
    Question: Why do you choose LGPL-3.0? For many, of the most attractive features of SQLite is its license (or should I say lack thereof). I realise some people view public domain as legally problematic. I think the best answer for that is public-domain equivalent licenses such as 0BSD [0] or MIT-0 [1] – technically still copyrighted, but effectively not. (There are other, possibly more well-known options such as... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Htmx changes license to Zero-Clause BSD
    There's also another OSI approved "zero" license called MIT-0 https://opensource.org/license/mit-0/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Show HN: Go from Idea to Prototype under 20 seconds
    Probably a MIT-0 header will make people less worried to use the code. Take a look at https://opensource.org/license/mit-0/ https://github.com/aws/mit-0. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Just going to put this here.
    There's even a variant of the license called 'MIT No Attribution License' that has this specific clause removed (just in case you aren't convinced that the clause does cover attribution): https://github.com/aws/mit-0. Source: about 1 year ago

Google Scholar mentions (999)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing MIT License and Google Scholar, you can also consider the following products

Simplified BSD License - Also known as the "2-clause" BSD license, this is a simplified version of an open source license created at the University of California Berkley.

PubMed.gov - PubMed comprises more than 29 million citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. Citations may include links to full-text content from PubMed Central and publisher web sites.

GPLv2 - Created for the GNU project, the GNU General Public License version 2 is the most popular free software license.

SCI-HUB - It provides mass and public access to tens of millions of research papers

AGPL - GNU Affero General Public License. Strong license for applications designed to guarentee user freedoms to access, modify, and redistribute server-side code.

Leap Motion - Reach into the future of virtual and augmented reality with the most advanced hand tracking on Earth, used by over 300,000 developers worldwide.