Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

NanoHost VS Splash Pro

Compare NanoHost VS Splash Pro and see what are their differences

Momen
Build powerful web apps, and create your custom AI apps, no code needed! featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

NanoHost logo NanoHost

Free, minimalist host application for Windows that can load VST-synths.

Splash Pro logo Splash Pro

A powerful music creation tool and the easiest way to get creative in Garageband, Logic Pro X, or your favourite DAW.
  • NanoHost Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-12-22
  • Splash Pro Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-10-31

NanoHost features and specs

  • Lightweight
    NanoHost is a very lightweight application, requiring minimal system resources, which makes it ideal for older systems or those with limited processing power.
  • Ease of Use
    The application has a simple and straightforward interface, making it approachable for beginners or those who want to quickly load and host VST plugins without a steep learning curve.
  • Portability
    NanoHost can be run from a USB stick or any other portable medium, allowing users to carry their plugin setups and use them on different computers without installation.
  • Freeware
    NanoHost is available for free, providing a cost-effective solution for users looking to host VST plugins without purchasing expensive DAWs.
  • Low-Latency
    It provides low-latency audio performance, which is essential for real-time audio processing and playback.

Possible disadvantages of NanoHost

  • Limited Features
    Compared to full-fledged DAWs or other advanced host applications, NanoHost has limited functionalities and is primarily focused on hosting VST plugins.
  • Windows Only
    NanoHost is only available for Windows, which limits its accessibility for users on macOS or Linux platforms.
  • No MIDI Recording
    It lacks built-in MIDI recording capabilities, which could be a drawback for users who want to capture and edit MIDI performances directly within the host.
  • Dependency on VSTs
    Since NanoHost is designed to host VST plugins, it is entirely dependent on the quality and variety of third-party VSTs available to the user.

Splash Pro features and specs

  • Realistic Sound
    Splash Pro offers high-quality and realistic sound generation for music production.
  • Easy to Use
    The interface is user-friendly, making it accessible for users with varying levels of expertise.
  • Integration
    Seamless integration with other digital audio workstations (DAWs) allows for a smooth workflow in music production.
  • Variety of Instruments
    Splash Pro supports a wide array of virtual instruments, offering a variety of sound options.

Possible disadvantages of Splash Pro

  • Cost
    The software may be expensive for individual users or small businesses on a tight budget.
  • Resource Intensive
    Splash Pro can be resource-heavy, requiring robust hardware for optimal performance.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendliness, some advanced features have a steep learning curve.
  • Limited Customization
    Some users might find the customization options limited compared to other professional music production tools.

NanoHost videos

+ Add

Test VST soft synths the easiest way for absolute beginners using nanohost

Splash Pro videos

+ Add

Free A.I. driven Vst plugin Splash Pro | Make Chords, Drums, Vocal CHops FREE

More videos:

  • Review - Splash Pro FREE A.I. Driven VST Plugin (Make Chords, Bass, Drum Patterns and Vocals in Seconds)
  • Tutorial - Splash Pro - Tutorial

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to NanoHost and Splash Pro)

NanoHost

Splash Pro

Audio & Music
48 48%
Audio & Music
52% 52
Email Marketing
47 47%
Email Marketing
53% 53
Audio
63 63%
Audio
37% 37
Tool
28 28%
Tool
72% 72

User comments

Share your experience with using NanoHost and Splash Pro. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Splash Pro seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

NanoHost mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of NanoHost yet. Tracking of NanoHost recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Splash Pro mentions (1)

  • New song "We are stars" generated by my TuneStar computer program (lyrics also generated)
    Akways love your creations. Wanted to share something new I heard about that works really well. It's a lot like Vocaloid but a little more realistic (which may or may not work better in your use case) but it's worth checking out, since it's free. Splash Pro midi / vocal generation. Source: about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing NanoHost and Splash Pro, you can also consider the following products

Cantabile - Plugin host for live performance.

Blue Cat's PatchWork - Blue Cat's PatchWork is a universal plug-ins patchbay and multi FX that can host up to 64 VST, VST3, Audio Unit or built-in plug-ins into any Digital Audio Workstation (DAW) in a single instance, with both serial and parallel routing options.

VSTHost - Hostprogram for VST-Plugins with ASIO-Support

Gig Performer - Gig Performer is a cross-platform audio plugin host for live music performances

SAVIHost - Make VST instrument plugins into standalone apps.

Blue Cat MB-7 Mixer - Blue Cat's MB-7 Mixer is a unique plug-in that splits the signal into several frequency bands and lets you re-mix and process them as if they were separate tracks: change levels, apply panning, add built-in effects, or even third party plug-ins.

Loading...