Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Ninja Build VS Visual Build

Compare Ninja Build VS Visual Build and see what are their differences

SysAid
SysAid is a comprehensive AI-powered Help Desk & ITSM platform with generative AI implemented into every element of service management featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Ninja Build logo Ninja Build

Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.

Visual Build logo Visual Build

Visual Build enables developers and build masters to create an automated, repeatable build process.
  • Ninja Build Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-14
  • Visual Build Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-19

Ninja Build videos

+ Add

FORTNITE STW: HERE IS THE BEST NINJA BUILD (AFTER MONTHS OF TESTING)

Visual Build videos

No Visual Build videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Ninja Build and Visual Build)

Ninja Build

Visual Build

Front End Package Manager
100 100%
Front End Package Manager
0% 0
DevOps Tools
0 0%
DevOps Tools
100% 100
JavaScript Package Manager
100 100%
JavaScript Package Manager
0% 0
Continuous Integration
73 73%
Continuous Integration
27% 27

User comments

Share your experience with using Ninja Build and Visual Build. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Ninja Build seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 22 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Ninja Build mentions (22)

  • TypeScript's Successor is Waiting, and You'll Never Want to Turn Back
    Under the hood, Rescript uses a build system called Ninja. Ninja is similar to Make, but cross-platform and more minimal/performant. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Using Make – writing less Makefile
    Ninja was super easy to pick up even after using make for some time (10+ years). GN is just a ninja generator that is optional. https://gn.googlesource.com/gn/+/main/docs/quick_start.md https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • Ask HN: What outdated tech are you still using and are perfectly happy with?
    Really? I thought most new projects were switching to ninja[^1] and have never used it. [^1]: https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • What was used to build C++ programs before Cmake?
    Ninja showed real promise for a while, but then CMake grew up and people stopped seeing a reason to leave it behind. Source: 12 months ago
  • Building and Running Pidgin and Finch 3
    Now that you have your build system all generated you can go ahead and build everything. By default Meson will use Ninja as the build tool. Ninja is similar to Make but much much faster. You can also generate additional build systems but that's outside of the scope of this post. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
View more

Visual Build mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Visual Build yet. Tracking of Visual Build recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Ninja Build and Visual Build, you can also consider the following products

Meson - Meson is an open source build system meant to be both extremely fast, and, even more importantly...

Ansible - Radically simple configuration-management, application deployment, task-execution, and multi-node orchestration engine

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

FinalBuilder - FinalBuilder is a build automation tool.

GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

Capistrano - A remote server automation and deployment tool written in Ruby

Loading...