Open Library Reviews

The Factual Reviews

Open Library mentions (263)

• MLIS books available digitally?

  Check out https://openlibrary.org. You can search ´library science’, librarian’, etc, and something should come up. Just select the ‘ebooks’ option to search for items within the collection. And you can narrow the search by subject, etc. Source: 7 months ago

• NaNoWriMo: National Novel Writing Month

  Right now I'm in the middle of the chicken and the egg problem where we don't have enough authors cataloging their publications and b/c of that obviously readers are not interested in using the site. I've gone back and forth with taking Open Libray's [0] catalog as that would at least flesh out our collection of books but then I'd have to deal with verifying authors to accounts so they can access their books.... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

• is there any way to read books for free?

  Here's one: https://openlibrary.org/. Source: 8 months ago

• YSK: You can access many old and out of print hiking books from the Internet Archive's Open Library

  The Internet Archive runs what they call the Open Library, which is a unique concept on the traditional library. You can sign-up with minimal details and digitally check out many scanned books from libraries all over the world. The only caveat is that almost all of the books are older editions - ones that would be impossible to find locally. It's great if you're looking for old routes, a look back in time, details... Source: 8 months ago

• Searching for a pharmacy book

  I want to clarify that I'm a non-US citizen, so accessing physical copies from US libraries or buying it from Amazon might not be feasible for me. To give you some context, my personal research was guided by the wiki section of r/FREEMEDIAHECKYEAH (https://www.reddit.com/r/FREEMEDIAHECKYEAH/wiki/reading/). I've conducted research using various online resources, including the Ebook & Open Source/Access Libraries... Source: 9 months ago

The Factual mentions (5)

• Sam on Tucker Carlson and why left-wing media is the only legitimate news source: "The only legitimate media, for the most part, is left-wing media ... Breitbart and Fox are not journalism ... I care about them as destructive forces in our society; they're pseudo media."

  From the site, thefactual.com, MSNBC's credibility, or factual rating, ranks them in the 17th percentile. That means that MSNBC is less factual than 83% of the other news sources presented in the dataset. CNN is in the 15th percentile. Fox News sits right in the middle of these two in the 16th percentile. Source: about 1 year ago

• A rebel disrupted The View today, interrupting climate-denying guest Ted Cruz.

  According to thefactual.com, CNN received a Factual Grade of 53.3%, placing it in the 15th percentile. Fox News received a Factual Grade of 53.6%, placing it in the 16th percentile. Both are shitty, but according to this analysis, Fox News is marginally higher. MSNBC received a Factual Grade of 54.9%, placing it in the 17th percentile. You are a Dunning-Kruger ignoramus. Source: over 1 year ago

• How do I grow my blog newsletter subscriptions?

  We also have a newsletter focused on credible news at thefactual.com, and we'd be happy to swab feedback! Source: almost 3 years ago

• Show HN: The Sample – newsletters curated for you with machine learning

  > Moreover investment of time on user side for newsletter delivering news increases with each newsletter vs One newsletter delivering what I want. You might be interested in this article[1] and the discussion of subscribed vs. Filtered sources. It'd be nice to have a convenient way to assign different priorities to newsletters/content sources. So for a few, you'd get every issue, and for the rest, they'd be... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

• What's behind the rise in anti-Asian hate crime? Join us on Clubhouse today!

  Hi there, yes, we're planning a follow-up discussion for this week! Follow us via email at thefactual.com, or social media @thefactualnews and we'll keep you updated on the upcoming discussion. Our previous one did well, and we tackled multiple perspectives with data. We hope you can join the next one! Source: over 3 years ago