Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

OpenSSH VS CyberArk Conjur

Compare OpenSSH VS CyberArk Conjur and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

OpenSSH logo OpenSSH

OpenSSH is a free version of the SSH connectivity tools that technical users rely on.

CyberArk Conjur logo CyberArk Conjur

Programmable open source interface that securely authenticates, controls and audits non-human access across tool stacks, apps, containers and cloud environments.
  • OpenSSH Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-29
  • CyberArk Conjur Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-05-09

OpenSSH features and specs

  • Security
    OpenSSH provides secure encrypted communications between two untrusted hosts over an insecure network, offering strong encryption standards and authentication mechanisms.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source project, OpenSSH is free to use and benefits from contributions and transparency from a wide community of developers and users.
  • Portability
    OpenSSH is highly portable and available across many operating systems, including Linux, macOS, and Windows, making it a versatile tool for different environments.
  • Rich Feature Set
    In addition to basic SSH functionality, OpenSSH includes features like secure file transfer (SFTP and SCP), tunneling, forwarding, and key management.
  • Strong Community Support
    OpenSSH benefits from extensive community and developer support, ensuring regular updates, patches, and a wealth of documentation and user discussions.

Possible disadvantages of OpenSSH

  • Complexity
    Configuring and managing OpenSSH can be complex, especially for beginners, and requires a good understanding of security principles and SSH protocols.
  • Performance Overhead
    Encryption and decryption processes can introduce performance overhead, which can be a concern in environments with high traffic or limited resources.
  • Dependency on Proper Configuration
    The security of OpenSSH heavily depends on proper configuration; misconfigurations can lead to vulnerabilities, defeating the purpose of using a secure protocol.
  • Limited GUI Tools
    OpenSSH primarily operates via command-line interface (CLI), which may not be as user-friendly as graphical user interface (GUI) tools for some users.
  • Compatibility Issues
    While OpenSSH is highly portable, there can be compatibility issues with certain legacy systems or non-standard SSH implementations.

CyberArk Conjur features and specs

  • Strong Security Model
    CyberArk Conjur provides a robust security model with role-based access control and auditing to ensure that secrets are managed securely.
  • Cloud-native
    Conjur is built to integrate seamlessly with cloud environments, which makes it a good fit for organizations using modern cloud infrastructure and DevOps practices.
  • Ease of Integration
    It offers numerous integrations with platforms like Kubernetes, Ansible, and Jenkins, facilitating easy adoption in existing workflows and infrastructure.
  • Open Source Option
    Conjur offers an open-source version, allowing organizations to evaluate and customize the basic features according to their needs without initial licensing costs.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    CyberArk Conjur provides detailed documentation and resources, which can help streamline the implementation and troubleshooting processes.

Possible disadvantages of CyberArk Conjur

  • Complexity in Initial Setup
    Setting up Conjur within an existing infrastructure can be complex and may require specialized knowledge to configure correctly.
  • Cost
    While there is an open-source version available, the full suite and enterprise features of CyberArk Conjur can be expensive for some organizations.
  • Learning Curve
    New users might experience a steep learning curve due to the advanced security concepts and configurations involved.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running a full-fledged Conjur system can require significant resources, which might be cumbersome for smaller setups or teams.
  • Limited Open-source Features
    The open-source version has limitations compared with the full enterprise product, potentially lacking some advanced features needed by larger organizations.

OpenSSH videos

Ubuntu Server 18.04 Administration Guide Part 02 - Securing OpenSSH

More videos:

  • Review - Linux Commands for Beginners 22 - Remote Management with OpenSSH

CyberArk Conjur videos

CyberArk Conjur CICD Demo

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to OpenSSH and CyberArk Conjur)
SSH
100 100%
0% 0
Monitoring Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Server Management
100 100%
0% 0
Security
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using OpenSSH and CyberArk Conjur. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare OpenSSH and CyberArk Conjur

OpenSSH Reviews

Top 10 Best MobaXterm Alternatives for Windows, macOS & Linux In 2021
OpenSSH is a safe and secure alternative to tools like MobaXterm (for which the password flows in clear on the network), however it is much more than that considering that it likewise permits to release remote commands (like rsh, or remsh), but also to transfer whole files or directories (like rcp). OpenSSH is available in the form of a daemon and a customer, the daemon...
30 best PuTTY alternatives for SSH clients for 2020
OpenSSH is a widely-used open source free emulator for Windows, Mac OS, Linux, and iOS. It is protected by SSH and incorporates SCP and SFTP for file transfers.

CyberArk Conjur Reviews

We have no reviews of CyberArk Conjur yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, CyberArk Conjur should be more popular than OpenSSH. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

OpenSSH mentions (1)

  • is ssh (OpenSSH) impacted by CVE-2022-3786 and CVE-2022-3602
    I haven't found a clear answer to this. After checking openssh.com I haven't found any mention. Source: over 2 years ago

CyberArk Conjur mentions (2)

  • Ask HN: Who is hiring? (May 2021)
    CyberArk (Conjur team) | Mid-Snr Infrastructure Engineer | REMOTE OR NEWTON, MA | FULL-TIME The Conjur infrastructure team provides support and internal tooling to the product engineers working on Conjur and Conjur Enterprise as well as a suite of associated products and integrations. Our job is to make sure engineering has the tools and facilities available to do their jobs with minimal infra-related effort on... - Source: Hacker News / almost 4 years ago
  • Securing Kubernetes Secrets with Conjur
    Conjur.org Conjur OSS Helm Chart Kubernetes Conjur Demo My GitHub repo with all the resources used in the post. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing OpenSSH and CyberArk Conjur, you can also consider the following products

Symantec Data Loss Prevention - Fully protect your data with the comprehensive detection technologies and unified policies of Symantec's industry leading Data Loss Prevention (DLP).

Qualys - Qualys helps your business automate the full spectrum of auditing, compliance and protection of your IT systems and web applications.

Microsoft BitLocker - BitLocker is a full disk encryption feature included with Windows Vista and later.

Trend Micro Deep Security - Excellent hybrid cloud security doesn't require your business to sacrifice operational performance. Trend Micro lets you keep business moving securely.

Paubox - Paubox provides HIPAA compliant email encryption without the hassle of extra steps.

Snyk - Snyk helps you use open source and stay secure. Continuously find and fix vulnerabilities for npm, Maven, NuGet, RubyGems, PyPI and much more.