Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

OpenVPN MI GUI VS WireGuard

Compare OpenVPN MI GUI VS WireGuard and see what are their differences

OpenVPN MI GUI logo OpenVPN MI GUI

OpenVPN MI GUI is a Windows graphical user interface for the OpenVPN client management interface.

WireGuard logo WireGuard

Fast, Modern, Secure VPN Tunnel
  • OpenVPN MI GUI Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-19
  • WireGuard Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-10-24

OpenVPN MI GUI features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    OpenVPN MI GUI provides a simple and intuitive interface that makes it easier for users, especially non-technical ones, to navigate and use OpenVPN features without having to rely heavily on command-line tools.
  • Enhanced OpenVPN Management
    The GUI facilitates better management of OpenVPN connections, allowing users to easily create, edit, and manage their VPN profiles without delving into complex configuration files.
  • Quick Access to Logs and Status
    Users can quickly access connection logs and status information through the interface, aiding in troubleshooting and ensuring that the VPN connection is functioning properly.
  • Lightweight
    The MI GUI is lightweight, ensuring that it runs smoothly without consuming significant system resources, which is ideal for users running older or less powerful hardware.

Possible disadvantages of OpenVPN MI GUI

  • Limited to Windows
    OpenVPN MI GUI is designed specifically for Windows platforms, which can be a limitation for users who need a cross-platform solution for managing OpenVPN connections.
  • Basic Features Only
    While the GUI provides essential management tools, it may lack advanced features and customization options available through command-line usage or other third-party OpenVPN clients.
  • Dependency on OpenVPN
    The GUI is not a standalone VPN solution and requires OpenVPN to be installed and properly configured, potentially complicating the setup process for beginners.
  • Potential Compatibility Issues
    Depending on the version of OpenVPN and Windows being used, there might be occasional compatibility issues or bugs that could affect the functionality of the GUI.

WireGuard features and specs

  • Simplicity
    WireGuard is noted for its simplicity in terms of codebase and configuration, making it easier to understand, audit, and maintain.
  • Performance
    WireGuard offers high performance, low latency, and minimal overhead, which results in faster connections compared to other VPN protocols.
  • Security
    WireGuard uses state-of-the-art cryptographic protocols and algorithms, providing a high level of security.
  • Cross-Platform
    WireGuard is compatible with many operating systems, including Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, and Android.
  • Modern Design
    Designed with modern networking use-cases in mind, WireGuard supports advanced features like roaming and easier NAT traversal.
  • Efficient Codebase
    With approximately 4,000 lines of code, WireGuard's minimalism reduces the attack surface and potential for vulnerabilities.

Possible disadvantages of WireGuard

  • Limited Features
    WireGuard primarily focuses on being a secure VPN protocol and lacks some advanced features found in other protocols.
  • Still Evolving
    As a relatively new technology, WireGuard may still undergo significant changes and improvements, which could impact stability and support.
  • Static IP Assignment
    WireGuard assigns static IP addresses to each peer, which can be less flexible compared to dynamic IP allocation in other VPN solutions.
  • Server Compatibility
    Some legacy infrastructures and older systems may not support WireGuard natively, creating challenges for widespread deployment.
  • No Built-in Authentication
    WireGuard itself does not include built-in authentication mechanisms, relying solely on public key cryptography for peer identification.
  • No Built-in Traffic Obfuscation
    WireGuard lacks built-in mechanisms for traffic obfuscation, making it easier for restrictive networks to detect and block WireGuard traffic.

OpenVPN MI GUI videos

No OpenVPN MI GUI videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

WireGuard videos

WireGuard Overview

More videos:

  • Review - What is WireGuard? Should You Use it? Best VPN for WireGuard?
  • Review - OpenVPN vs WireGuard vs IKEv2 vs PPTP - Which is the Best VPN Protocol to use in 2020?

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to OpenVPN MI GUI and WireGuard)
VPN
7 7%
93% 93
Cloud VPN
8 8%
92% 92
Security & Privacy
7 7%
93% 93
VPN Software
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using OpenVPN MI GUI and WireGuard. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare OpenVPN MI GUI and WireGuard

OpenVPN MI GUI Reviews

We have no reviews of OpenVPN MI GUI yet.
Be the first one to post

WireGuard Reviews

Best Top 20 OpenVPN Alternatives (Pros and Cons)
Wireguard is a VPN alternative that is under development. Yet it is faster and carefully designed when compared to other similar products.
6 Types of VPN Protocols, Compared: Which is the Best to Use?
In essence, every VPN has to strengthen WireGuard’s wobbly privacy to benefit from its speed and security. That’s why we recommend using WireGuard-based protocols only if they come from reputable VPN providers. NordVPN, for example, fixes WireGuard’s privacy issues with the so-called “double NAT system” (network address translation). This allows them to establish secure...
Source: vpnoverview.com
OpenVPN vs WireGuard: Which protocol is best?
WireGuard was not designed to obfuscate user traffic to this degree, and only supports UDP. This means that a simple, standalone WireGuard connection is easy to detect. However, as WireGuard is so extensible, most VPN providers have added their own obfuscation methods on top. The efficacy of these varies, but we’ve seen services with WireGuard support that even work in...
The 10 Best Open Source VPN Apps
In addition to using the latest encryption techniques, Mullvad is based on some of the VPN protocols in WireGuard and OpenVPN. So, users will be able to decide for themselves which VPN client to opt for. Also, you can find Mullvad on Windows, macOS, and Linux-based systems, as well as Android and iOS. There is no paid version of Mullvad, either, so you need not worry about...
WireGuard vs OpenVPN
WireGuard was designed for speed and security. It was not specifically designed for people like us, who look to their VPN service for both security and privacy. However, in order to give users the benefits of WireGuard, VPN services have come up with WireGuard solutions that add strong privacy protections without sacrificing what makes WireGuard special. Here’s the problem:

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, WireGuard seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 9 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

OpenVPN MI GUI mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of OpenVPN MI GUI yet. Tracking of OpenVPN MI GUI recommendations started around Mar 2021.

WireGuard mentions (9)

  • Remote access from work/corporate network
    Wireguard. Wireguard uses UDP only and runs TCP sockets over UDP. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Central reverse-proxy ssh access?
    Look at Wireguard. I know you don't want Yet Another VPN running alongside your IPSec, but it's less VPN and more encrypted point-to-point UDP. You can set it up on any port you wish, including common ports that might be open on an outbound smart firewall not doing deep packet inspection. That way, it can stay out of the way of your existing IPSec deployment. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Official /r/rust "Who's Hiring" thread for job-seekers and job-offerers [Rust 1.69]
    We use Elixir/Erlang for our control plane, and Rust for our data plane, built on the excellent WireGuard® tunneling protocol. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Globally distributed Elixir over Tailscale
    Both products are based off Wireguard which is available for all new linux distributions. https://wireguard.com . I'm not saying OP's solution is wrong, just curious what the advantages are. Other than potentially simpler client setup, what are the advantages of paying for tailscale. With the opensource tailscale, I'm not sure if you get access to an api you can use to look up the hosts. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Whisper: wraps any Go io.ReadWriter in a secure tunnel using Ed25519/X25519
    Noise Protocol Framework (used by Wireguard). Source: about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing OpenVPN MI GUI and WireGuard, you can also consider the following products

OpenVPN Manager - OpenVPN Manager is a tool which controls OpenVPN.

OpenVPN - OpenVPN - The Open Source VPN

Viscosity - Viscosity is a VPN client for Mac OS X and Windows.

ProtonVPN - ProtonVPN is a security focused FREE VPN service, developed by CERN and MIT scientists. Use the web anonymously, unblock websites & encrypt your connection.

fruho - fruho is an open-source, zero-configuration VPN manager.

ZeroTier - Extremely simple P2P Encrypted VPN