Pale Moon Reviews

Kialo Reviews

Pale Moon mentions (6)

• XUL Layout has been removed from Firefox

  The Palemoon browser [0] also still uses XUL, and is in many ways a continuation of XUL browsers (was originally forked from FF 29, updated with various components from FF 50+, and with many other tweaks). [0] https://palemoon.org. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

• All computers are garbage!

  The Pale Moon browser https://palemoon.org/ strikes a pretty good balance, IMO. They forked it from Firefox 24 and focused development narrowly on fixing Firefox's massive backlog of bugs and keeping up with core web standards. Source: over 1 year ago

• Browser sync—what are the risks of turning it on?

  Or use a browser that unlike Chromezilla browsers just uses a local encryption key for sync that's your responsibility to not forget, so even if their sync server is hacked no one can read your synced data. Source: about 2 years ago

• Firefox DYING is TERRIBLE for the Web

  Check it out: https://palemoon.org/. Source: over 2 years ago

• Pre configured setting for Firefox privacy, security, anti-fingerprinting.

  Or use Pale Moon, which is an updated, independent fork of Firefox without the retarded changes brought in after Australis (haters repeating ignorant lies that it is oLd aNd iNsEcUrE and who demonstrably have no clue what a software fork means can go sit on a cactus). Source: about 3 years ago

Kialo mentions (5)

• Looking for rational debates, books, and papers from climate change DENIERS

  Don't listen to them. What you are doing is very anti-polarisation. In a polarised society, you will have a lot of disbelievers in you. Don't listen to them. To make any convincing argument, you have to put it through the scrutiny of multiple arguments in all sides. Climate deniers are not climate deniers because they run away from truth, they are because they think they found THE truth. If their arguments can be... Source: over 1 year ago

• Because ads to tell kids that myocarditis is normal have always been around

  Kialo.com is better for real debate. There you could cite your study, and people could discuss why it does-or-doesn't apply to this-or-that population, and any name-calling, or maligning someone's attitude, would be deleted with explanation and invitation to rephrase. Source: almost 2 years ago

• Some people here needs to learn how to have a debate, i criticized the inclusion of the Undersiders and how it was handled in Ward and got nuked (Destroyed) and i will stand my ground goddammit

  Should check out https://kialo.com . Best site for forming a healthy debate. Source: almost 2 years ago

• Where to find people willing to help with giant argument mapping discussion to test religious claims?

  I read it and it looks like they studied r/TheRedPill, r/DatingAdvice, r/Atheism, and r/TheDonald, but I don't see where it suggests the results might apply to subreddits such as r/religion or other discussion platforms such as kialo.com. Also, they only seem to have found a small bias in the more neutral subreddit r/DatingAdvice. Source: almost 3 years ago

• Looking for volunteers to test the "Yes/no debate" strategy

  And about your second suggesting: Yes, I also had something like in mind – and in fact, there is kialo.com already doing it! Source: about 3 years ago