Choosing a globally respected Employer of Record (EOR) as an alternative to overseas subsidiaries, such as Skuad or PapayaGlobal. Such companies may be able to help you manage remote employees without the requirement for a foreign corporation. When considering expansion into new markets, it is critical to weigh the benefits and drawbacks of both approaches for globalization. Source: about 2 years ago

Yes, and most of them can also help your employees relocate to a country where you don't have an entity via EOR (Employer of Record): few more suggestions: https://www.oysterhr.com https://gusto.com https://papayaglobal.com https://pilot.com. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

Six months after raising $250 million, Papaya Global is making a key acquisition to expand its cloud-based HR and payroll platform globally on the heels of major surge in remote working. The Israeli startup is acquiring Azimo — the London-based money transfer business that Facebook once tried to buy to spearhead its own remittance efforts — a deal that will see Papaya Global moving into more markets, and launching... Source: over 2 years ago

There are some specialised companies to do this, like remote.com or papayaglobal.com but they cost money. Also you need to prepare your US employer that cost of employment will be much higher in Sweden. Source: almost 3 years ago

Some of the organizations that provide digital HR platforms for remote teams are Skuad, Omnipresent, Papaya Global, etc. Source: about 3 years ago

There is a google docs form to fill out at the top of the ethos.io page ( I don't want to direct link it, not sure if it has identifiers in the URL?). Source: over 1 year ago

I hate pushing my opinion on folks (because I really do respect folks who want to be fully done and they're completely valid) but I really do think there should be at least some consideration to the waves or ethos.io proposals (or more due diligence since it seemed like Binance and a few other companies were involved). If FTX truly is the best deal fine, but I do think equity and our crypto being given back... Source: almost 2 years ago

4) Voyager took multiple years to switch simple systems and was called out by ethos.io and former board director https://twitter.com/shingolavine/status/1574472263247634432. Source: almost 2 years ago

Shingo Lavine who's company Ethos.io (that was acquired by Voyager) made a statement on this as well: https://twitter.com/shingolavine/status/1573030726139727872 stating that that app remake and sharing revenue plan might work well with their Ethos.io plan / proposal here: https://cases.stretto.com/public/x193/11753/PLEADINGS/1175307292280000000006.pdf. Source: almost 2 years ago

And that ethos.io was not rebranded into VOyager. Voyager bought Ethos....2 very different scenarios. Source: over 2 years ago