Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Phoenix VS Fluxbox

Compare Phoenix VS Fluxbox and see what are their differences

Phoenix logo Phoenix

Brief Description of Phoenix software: Phoenix is a light platform that acts as a macOS and windows application manager and is scriptable with JavaScript. Read more about Phoenix.

Fluxbox logo Fluxbox

Fluxbox is a window manager for X that was based on the Blackbox 0.61.1 code.
  • Phoenix Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-19
  • Fluxbox Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-18

Phoenix features and specs

  • Customizability
    Phoenix offers extensive options for customization through its configuration using JavaScript, allowing users to define precise window management behaviors tailored to their preferences.
  • Lightweight
    The application is lightweight, not consuming excessive system resources, ensuring that it runs smoothly even on older hardware.
  • Open Source
    Being open source, Phoenix allows users to audit the codebase for security and modify it to suit their needs, fostering community collaboration and improvements.
  • Highly Scriptable
    Phoenix supports extensive scripting capabilities, enabling users to automate tasks and create complex workflows that enhance productivity.

Possible disadvantages of Phoenix

  • Steep Learning Curve
    Because Phoenix requires writing code for configuration, it can be challenging for users who are not familiar with programming, particularly JavaScript.
  • Limited Documentation
    The documentation available for Phoenix may not be comprehensive, posing difficulties for users who need guidance on advanced configurations and features.
  • MacOS Exclusive
    Phoenix is only available for macOS, restricting its use to Mac users and excluding those on other operating systems like Windows or Linux.
  • Potential Stability Issues
    As with many highly customizable and scriptable applications, user scripts can sometimes lead to unexpected behavior or crashes if not correctly written.

Fluxbox features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Fluxbox is a minimalist window manager that uses very little system resources, making it ideal for older or less powerful hardware.
  • Customization
    Offers extensive customization options, allowing users to tailor the desktop environment to their preferences with themes, styles, and configurable keyboard shortcuts.
  • Speed
    Due to its minimalist design, Fluxbox is very fast and responsive, providing a smooth user experience.
  • Stability
    Fluxbox is known for its stability and reliability, with fewer crashes or performance issues compared to more feature-rich desktop environments.
  • Low Dependencies
    Requires fewer dependencies compared to full-fledged desktop environments, simplifying the installation and maintenance process.
  • Scriptability
    Highly scriptable using shell scripting, providing advanced users with powerful tools to automate and configure their environment.
  • Multiple Desktops
    Supports multiple desktop configurations, allowing users to organize their workspace more efficiently.

Possible disadvantages of Fluxbox

  • Learning Curve
    The minimalist design may be difficult for new users to learn and configure effectively, especially those used to more feature-rich desktop environments.
  • Limited Features
    Lacks many built-in features and utilities that are standard in other desktop environments, requiring users to manually install additional software.
  • Aesthetic
    May not be as visually appealing out-of-the-box compared to other desktop environments, requiring more effort to achieve a polished look.
  • Community Support
    Smaller user community compared to larger desktop environments, potentially making it harder to find help and resources.
  • Compatibility
    Some applications designed for more comprehensive desktop environments may not integrate smoothly with Fluxbox, requiring additional tweaks.
  • Advanced Configuration
    Requires editing text files for certain configurations, which can be intimidating and inconvenient for users who prefer graphical configuration tools.

Phoenix videos

Phoenix Review ⚠️ WARNING ⚠️ DON'T GET THIS WITHOUT MY 👷 CUSTOM 👷 BONUSES!!

More videos:

  • Review - Phoenix Review and Bonuses

Fluxbox videos

Openbox, Fluxbox or JWM which one do you like?

More videos:

  • Review - Salix OS 13.1.2 Fluxbox Review - Linux Distro Reviews
  • Review - Manjaro's New Fluxbox 15.10 Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Phoenix and Fluxbox)
Window Manager
26 26%
74% 74
OSX Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Linux
13 13%
87% 87
Utilities
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Phoenix and Fluxbox. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Phoenix should be more popular than Fluxbox. It has been mentiond 11 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Phoenix mentions (11)

  • macOS Sequoia Preview
    I'll probably still use phoenix since I can code it to do whatever I want. https://github.com/kasper/phoenix. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • Ask HN: What software sparks joy when using?
    In no particular order: Prologue [0] - iOS Audiobook player, used Plex as a media source Overcast [1] - iOS Podcast player CleanShotX [2] - macOS screenshot/video/gif capture with annotation Drafts [3] - iOS/macOS note taking tool Paprika [4] - Cross platform recipe app YNAB [5] - "You Need A Budget" - web/mobile budgeting app 1Password [6] - Cross platform password manager Carrot Weather [7] - iOS weather app... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Yabai – A tiling window manager for macOS
    Phoenix [0] is another option in this space if you want to write JS/TS instead of Lua. I just commented about it here [1]. [0] https://github.com/kasper/phoenix. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Yabai – A tiling window manager for macOS
    Have you heard of Phoenix [1]? It seems relatively unknown but I actually found it to work better than Yabai in some ways. The gist is that it basically simulates a tiling wm and virtual desktops by internally tracking state. It's also highly hackable/extensible being written in JS. Spin2Win [2] is a config that's worked well for me. [1] https://github.com/kasper/phoenix That said, it seems there are no perfect... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Ask HN: Why does Apple refuse to add window snapping to macOS?
    When I was annoyed with this I went ahead and downloaded phoenix (https://github.com/kasper/phoenix) wrote a little javascript and now I have a bunch of globally accessable hotkeys so I can lay my windows out in a number of combinations. Right now I have setups for over/under left/right, two by two grid, and three by three grid. I've got some plans to spend some time... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
View more

Fluxbox mentions (6)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Phoenix and Fluxbox, you can also consider the following products

Magnet Window Manager - Magnet Developers

i3 - A dynamic tiling window manager designed for X11, inspired by wmii, and written in C.

Openbox - Openbox is a highly configurable, next generation window manager with extensive standards support.

IceWM - icewm home page . Bug Tracking. If you have a patch, a bug report or a feature request to submit, please do so at the icewm project page at SourceForge.

yabai - A tiling window manager for macOS based on binary space partitioning

awesome - A dynamic window manager for the X Window System developed in the C and Lua programming languages.