Pirsch Analytics Reviews

1. Zep Fietje

   over 1 year ago

   After trying many analytics tools, only Pirsch met my needs. Pirsch is the most complete, beautiful and affordable analytics solution out there.

   🏁 Competitors: Fathom Analytics, Plausible.io

   👍 Pros:    Beautiful ui|Nice ux|Powerful events functionality

BuildJet for GitHub Actions Reviews

Pirsch Analytics mentions (25)

• Using Analytics on My Website

  I was also looking for server-side analytics, created my own, and now it's a product! The idea is that tracking can be done from both, a JS snippet (for easy integration) and an API. Both rely on fingerprinting and almost provide the same set of features. The API just lacks screen resolution. The method is GDPR (and CCPA and whatnot) compliant. Original article:... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

• Site analytics for open source project?

  Take a look at Pirsch. You can find a demo with real data here. Source: about 1 year ago

• Ask HN: Side project of more that $2k monthly revenue what's your project?

  I'm building Pirsch Analytics [0], a privacy-friendly web analytics tool. I think it took the two of us ~1.5 years to get to $2000 MRR. Currently we're setting just above $4000 MRR. It started as an experiment for my personal website and I was in the same position as you're right now. We were already working on a Notion like app to take notes, but didn't make any money and probably went into the wrong direction.... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

• I'm building a new SaaS tool: open source analytics for the web

  Not saying you shouldn’t or anything, but Plausible, Pirsch, and Umami are already privacy friendly open-source analytics. Source: about 1 year ago

• Ask HN: Any alternatives to Google Analytics that don't require cookies?

  Pirsch has been easy and great IME. [0] https://pirsch.io. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

BuildJet for GitHub Actions mentions (5)

• Experiment: The costs of slow build times

  Disclaimer: Co-founder of https://buildjet.com/for-github-actions While more cores can certainly help with certain types of projects, such as those that can be easily parallelized, this is not always the case. For example, web app projects won't benefit as much from additional cores. Another important factor to consider is the single-core performance of each vCPU. Many server-class CPUs, such as those used by... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

• Blazing fast CI with MicroVMs

  Congratulations on the launch. It looks pretty much like a self-hosted version of https://buildjet.com/for-github-actions. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

• CircleCI Announces Support for Gitlab

  I'm a bit biased as one of the founders of BuildJet, but we solve this exact issue. BuildJet for GitHub Actions, plugs elegantly into GitHub Actions. With 1-line change in your config, you get 2x speed for half of GitHub's price. Check it out @ https://buildjet.com/for-github-actions. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

• We use GitHub Actions to build GitHub

  With BuildJet for GitHub Actions, you can get up to 64 vCPU as a GitHub Actions runner. We plug right into your existing setup and have a significantly higher per core performance compared to the native runner. Check us out here: https://buildjet.com/for-github-actions. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

• GitHub Actions by Example

  Incoming shameless plug; if you don’t have to handle the hosting runners, but still to reap the benefits of having proper hardware (close to the metal). Check out BuildJet for GitHub actions[1] - 2x the speed for half the price. Easy to install and easy to revert. [1] https://buildjet.com/for-github-actions. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago