Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Polarr 2.0a VS Sitecake

Compare Polarr 2.0a VS Sitecake and see what are their differences

Polarr 2.0a logo Polarr 2.0a

An online photo editor (big data meets Lightroom)

Sitecake logo Sitecake

Drag and drop CMS for HTML websites. It's flat file CMS so it's pretty fast.
  • Polarr 2.0a Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-01
  • Sitecake Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-09-11

Polarr 2.0a videos

No Polarr 2.0a videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Sitecake videos

Editing a Website with Sitecake CMS

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Polarr 2.0a and Sitecake)
Image Editing
100 100%
0% 0
CMS
0 0%
100% 100
Photography
100 100%
0% 0
Blogging Platform
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Polarr 2.0a and Sitecake. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Sitecake should be more popular than Polarr 2.0a. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Polarr 2.0a mentions (2)

  • My Canon XTI doesn't have a B&W feature, should I spend 30$ and get a Canon XT that does?
    There is an online tool https://v2.polarr.co/ to play around. Source: over 1 year ago
  • ITAP of some trees in the fog
    I didn't have Lightroom on my laptop when editing this, so I found polarr image editor online which is free and pretty powerful. I was happy to find a great free product so I'd like to share it with all you as well :). Source: about 3 years ago

Sitecake mentions (5)

  • Maintaining this site fucking sucks
    Use something like this? CMS that generates static html? https://sitecake.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Publii: Open-source local WYSIWYG static site CMS
    I think that user experience of website builders with wysiwyg and drag and drop UX won over time. Then, as time passed by, website builders become bloated and complex. Once again you needed a professional to maintain your site in site builder. So now simple solutions, static HTML, free or one-time fee CMSs are sexy again. (economy is not good, who wants another subscription?) I know because 14 years ago we have... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Best solution that would give clients the ability to edit content on their extremely minimal/simple site?
    Https://sitecake.com/ works with simple html and PHP sites.... Veeeerrrry simple for client edits. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Conventional approach to allowing business owner to edit static site?
    May be a suitable use case for https://sitecake.com/. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Do you know any No-Code CMS or Data-Base for self-hosted Webflow Sites?
    Other than that: Inline Editing CMS examples: Coast CMS, all you need to do is make the html editable with some classes and you're done. The CMS is kind of outdated though. Other examples: simplyedit.io, surrealcms.com, jocms.net, inlinecms.com, sitecake.com. Source: about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Polarr 2.0a and Sitecake, you can also consider the following products

Affinity Photo - Affinity is the imaging and design suite for creative professionals exclusively for Mac.

ClassicPress - The WordPress fork. No Gutenberg. Great future!

Acorn - Acorn is a photo editor built for the rest of us.

TYPO3 - TYPO3.com - Infos, SLAs, Extended Support Versions and more

ImagenAI - Say goodbye to Lightroom presets, the future of photo editing is here.Meet ImagenAI, the only AI-powered personalized Lightroom editing assistant that edits just like you and cuts your editing time by 75%.

Anchor CMS - Free and lightweight blogging system