The Processing Foundation is thrilled to announce the open call for pr05 (pronounced “pros”), a new grant and mentorship initiative designed to support the professional growth of early to mid-career software developers through hands-on involvement in open-source projects. This is a unique opportunity to grow as a developer while making a tangible impact on software projects used by millions of creatives, artists,... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago

Reply I disagree. There are so many creative tools that are now online that you can access from your browser that were not envisioned in the original web. It is obviously true that not EVERY website is about creation (but to expect that seems unreasonable?), but even Wikipedia is a collaborative project. Examples include products from big vendors like Adobe's Photoshop, to smaller products like SketchUp, to more... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

Would processing[0] be a good fit? It's designed to be easy to use and learn but powerful enough for professional use. Very quick to get cool stuff moving on a screen and the syntax is Java with a streamlined editing environment. [0] https://processing.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

Processing? https://processing.org/ Or do you specifically mean mathematical diagrams and a DSL specifically for that? - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

I would personally use the language Processing. It's the one I use the most. And it's relatively easy to start drawing text, squares, and do other kinds of things. (It's kind of like java, but without all the boilerplate code). Source: 7 months ago

Try this: https://experiments.withgoogle.com/collection/ai. Source: over 1 year ago

But Google has a whole set of AI writing tools - https://experiments.withgoogle.com/collection/ai So by their own definition they are producing spam? - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

Https://experiments.withgoogle.com/collection/ai might also help (I haven't used this IRL). Source: over 2 years ago

It's hard to imagine you've not seen Google's doodle guessing training (or their other experiments) but it's just another example of how little information you actually need to create a recognizable image, though Canvas also shows this off, but it has the benefit of material information. Source: over 2 years ago

To come back to your original question, as far as I'm aware anyone can publish on arxiv or researchgate. People will just tend to take you less serious. Maybe a better solution for you is something like this https://experiments.withgoogle.com/collection/ai . You already said you think your idea might be industry changing so if it truly is, I'm sure people will start noticing you. Source: about 3 years ago