Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

ProsperOps VS CMake

Compare ProsperOps VS CMake and see what are their differences

ICT CLOUD
ICT CLOUD EMEA's Global Award-Winning Cloud Service Provider featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

ProsperOps logo ProsperOps

Cost optimization tools and expertise from the creators of AWS' largest Managed Service Provider. Our customers increase savings an average of 34%.

CMake logo CMake

CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.
  • ProsperOps Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-23
  • CMake Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-09-21

We recommend LibHunt CMake for discovery and comparisons of trending CMake projects.

ProsperOps videos

No ProsperOps videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

CMake videos

+ Add

CMake for Dummies

More videos:

  • Review - CppCon 2017: Mathieu Ropert “Using Modern CMake Patterns to Enforce a Good Modular Design”
  • Review - Hunter, a CMake driven package manager for C/C++ projects - Daniel Friedrich - Lightning Talks

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to ProsperOps and CMake)

ProsperOps

CMake

Cloud Management
100 100%
Cloud Management
0% 0
Front End Package Manager
0 0%
Front End Package Manager
100% 100
Cloud Cost Optimization
100 100%
Cloud Cost Optimization
0% 0
JavaScript Package Manager
0 0%
JavaScript Package Manager
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using ProsperOps and CMake. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare ProsperOps and CMake

ProsperOps Reviews

35+ Of The Best CI/CD Tools: Organized By Category
ProsperOps is a relatively new cost optimization tool for AWS. It features a free non-invasive savings analysis solution that pulls detailed data that would take a team at least a week to manually compile.
Source: www.cloudzero.com

CMake Reviews

We have no reviews of CMake yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, CMake seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 51 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

ProsperOps mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of ProsperOps yet. Tracking of ProsperOps recommendations started around Mar 2021.

CMake mentions (51)

  • Top 7 C++ Tools to explore in 2024 if it's not already the case.
    CMake stands for "Cross-platform Make" and is an open-source, platform-independent build system. It's designed to build, test, and package software projects written in C and C++, but it can also be used for other languages. Here's an overview of CMake and its features:. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • My first Software Release using GitHub Release
    When doing research for this lab exercise I looked at both vcpkg and conan. Both are package managers that would automate the installation and configuration of my program with its dependencies. However, when it came to releasing and sharing my program my options were limited. For example, the central public registry for conan packages is conan-center, but these packages are curated and the process is very... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • A little help for a C++ newbie
    Install the CMake program using your system package manager, e.g. Sudo apt-get install cmake. Source: 9 months ago
  • Questions Regarding working with Mingw_w64, MSYS2, and CMake on Windows
    Oh I just assumed it was talking about the one from cmake.org since I was having trouble. I can now confirm that mingw-w64-cmake and the binary from cmake.org do operate in mostly identical ways. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Questions Regarding working with Mingw_w64, MSYS2, and CMake on Windows
    Then looking at any one of the many examples provided on cmake.org, it's clearly a viable way to do set(CMAKE_*), (e.g., set(CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD 11) Set(CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD_REQUIRED True)). Of course, another way to set these variables is to use the -D flag as you suggested, but I was just wondering why you would prohibit using set(CMAKE_*). Source: about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing ProsperOps and CMake, you can also consider the following products

Hyperglance - Complete cloud visibility: real-time diagrams, insight, & built-in automation. Visualize & optimize your cloud in minutes. Start a free trial today!

GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

Cloudability - Cloudability lets you monitor, manage and communicate your cloud costs with one easy tool.

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

Strategic Blue - Validate how well committed on AWS your organization is, with our Free Savings Report 💰

Ninja Build - Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.

Loading...