Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Protobuf VS Apache ServiceMix

Compare Protobuf VS Apache ServiceMix and see what are their differences

Protobuf logo Protobuf

Protocol buffers are a language-neutral, platform-neutral extensible mechanism for serializing structured data.

Apache ServiceMix logo Apache ServiceMix

Apache ServiceMix is an open source ESB that combines the functionality of a Service Oriented Architecture and the modularity.
  • Protobuf Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-29
  • Apache ServiceMix Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-07-09

Protobuf videos

StreamBerry, part 2 : introduction to Google ProtoBuf

Apache ServiceMix videos

No Apache ServiceMix videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Protobuf and Apache ServiceMix)
Configuration Management
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Computing
0 0%
100% 100
Mobile Apps
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Storage
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Protobuf and Apache ServiceMix. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Protobuf seems to be a lot more popular than Apache ServiceMix. While we know about 82 links to Protobuf, we've tracked only 1 mention of Apache ServiceMix. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Protobuf mentions (82)

  • Developing games on and for Mac and Linux
    Protocol Buffers: https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Adding Codable conformance to Union with Metaprogramming
    ProtocolBuffers’ OneOf message addresses the case of having a message with many fields where at most one field will be set at the same time. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Logcat is awful. What would you improve?
    That's definitely the bigger thing. I think something like Protocol Buffers (Protobuf) is what you're looking for there. Output the data and consume it by something that can handle the analysis. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Bitcoin is the "narrow waist" of internet-based value
    These protocols prevent an O(N x M) explosion of code that have to solve for many cases. For example, since JSON is an almost ubiquitous format for wire transfer (although other things do exist like protobufs), if I had N data formats that I want to serialize, I only need to write N serializers/deserializers (SerDes). If there was no such narrow waist and there were M alternatives to JSON in wide usage, I would... Source: over 1 year ago
  • Understanding gRPC Concepts, Use Cases & Best Practices
    gRPC uses protocol buffers (it is an open source message format) as the default method of communication between client and server. Also, gRPC uses HTTP/ 2 as the default protocol. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
View more

Apache ServiceMix mentions (1)

  • Even Amazon can't make sense of serverless or microservices
    It wasn't "great" mind you but it was "different" to what I was used too (https://servicemix.apache.org/) one interesting thing with this is that it's a monolith approach but each service was constructed as a loadable package. Source: about 1 year ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Protobuf and Apache ServiceMix, you can also consider the following products

gRPC - Application and Data, Languages & Frameworks, Remote Procedure Call (RPC), and Service Discovery

Apache Karaf - Apache Karaf is a lightweight, modern and polymorphic container powered by OSGi.

Messagepack - An efficient binary serialization format.

rkt - App Container runtime

TOML - TOML - Tom's Obvious, Minimal Language

GlusterFS - GlusterFS is a scale-out network-attached storage file system.