Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Protobuf VS (R)?ex

Compare Protobuf VS (R)?ex and see what are their differences

Protobuf logo Protobuf

Protocol buffers are a language-neutral, platform-neutral extensible mechanism for serializing structured data.

(R)?ex logo (R)?ex

(R)?ex - manage all your boxes from a central point - Datacenter Automation and Configuration...
  • Protobuf Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-29
  • (R)?ex Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-02

Protobuf videos

StreamBerry, part 2 : introduction to Google ProtoBuf

(R)?ex videos

No (R)?ex videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Protobuf and (R)?ex)
Configuration Management
100 100%
0% 0
SSH
0 0%
100% 100
Mobile Apps
100 100%
0% 0
Network & Admin
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Protobuf and (R)?ex. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Protobuf seems to be a lot more popular than (R)?ex. While we know about 82 links to Protobuf, we've tracked only 2 mentions of (R)?ex. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Protobuf mentions (82)

  • Developing games on and for Mac and Linux
    Protocol Buffers: https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Adding Codable conformance to Union with Metaprogramming
    ProtocolBuffers’ OneOf message addresses the case of having a message with many fields where at most one field will be set at the same time. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Logcat is awful. What would you improve?
    That's definitely the bigger thing. I think something like Protocol Buffers (Protobuf) is what you're looking for there. Output the data and consume it by something that can handle the analysis. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Bitcoin is the "narrow waist" of internet-based value
    These protocols prevent an O(N x M) explosion of code that have to solve for many cases. For example, since JSON is an almost ubiquitous format for wire transfer (although other things do exist like protobufs), if I had N data formats that I want to serialize, I only need to write N serializers/deserializers (SerDes). If there was no such narrow waist and there were M alternatives to JSON in wide usage, I would... Source: over 1 year ago
  • Understanding gRPC Concepts, Use Cases & Best Practices
    gRPC uses protocol buffers (it is an open source message format) as the default method of communication between client and server. Also, gRPC uses HTTP/ 2 as the default protocol. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
View more

(R)?ex mentions (2)

  • Ansible vs Fabric
    Have a look on Rex - https://rexify.org, in addition to dsl like constructs it is just pure perl. It also doesn't need any dependencies on the managed host, just perl and ssh. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Configuring netplan enabled hosts with Rex
    Since I feel that rex needs more attention, here is a small example from $work using rex. Needed to quickly reconfigure a number of Ubuntu hosts with netplan to use static ip addresses instead of DHCP. Source: about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Protobuf and (R)?ex, you can also consider the following products

gRPC - Application and Data, Languages & Frameworks, Remote Procedure Call (RPC), and Service Discovery

Python Fabric - Fabric is a Python library and command-line tool for streamlining the use of SSH for application...

Messagepack - An efficient binary serialization format.

Ansible - Radically simple configuration-management, application deployment, task-execution, and multi-node orchestration engine

TOML - TOML - Tom's Obvious, Minimal Language

OpenSSH - OpenSSH is a free version of the SSH connectivity tools that technical users rely on.