Based on our record, Google Fonts seems to be a lot more popular than Quarto. While we know about 343 links to Google Fonts, we've tracked only 24 mentions of Quarto. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
I can't stand jupyter notebooks for several reasons. I've been using https://quarto.org/ and writing .qmd docs and really enjoy it. - Source: Hacker News / 2 days ago
From the source, looks like they're using Quarto: https://quarto.org. - Source: Hacker News / 12 days ago
"But it's surprisingly challenging to publish books on the web in nice, cohesive, tight, easy-to-navigate HTML format." Quarto is one great option for doing that today. Bonus: it can also generate EPUBs and PDFs, all from one set of source files. https://quarto.org/ It's free and open source. https://github.com/quarto-dev/quarto-cli https://jjallaire.github.io/hopr/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
I've used Quarto[1] to build a personal blog and it has been really easy and straightforward. Especially if you want to run some code alongside the post (like Python, R, or Julia). As far as I know, you can also use it to write books and presentations. [1]: https://quarto.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
> Interactive examples have been added to the documentation, allowing users to run the examples locally on embedded Jupyterlite notebooks in their browser. This might sound strange, but to me this is the most exciting thing listed in the update document. I've been looking for ways to include _interactive_ Python scripts on static webpages (such as those made using Jupyter Book [1] or Quarto [1]. Up to now the only... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
Hi HN, just a fun little "rapid prototyping" tool I threw together for my team. We're maybe updating the font on https://pigweed.dev (suggestions welcome if you're one of our customers/users!) and I wanted a way to quickly see how different fonts look on the site. Typing in any Google Font (https://fonts.google.com) name in the `Font Name` textbox (bottom-right) should work. You may need to look at the embed code... - Source: Hacker News / 4 days ago
The simplest and cheapest way of getting fonts to your app is Google Fonts. We need to open Google fonts page and type in the search panel the font we need, or just scroll and choose the font we like the most. There are two options for getting fonts: get embed code (in that case we will get 2 links which we should import directly to our index.html file and fonts will be downloaded to the client each time the app... - Source: dev.to / 18 days ago
To find your desired font, visit Google Fonts and make a selection. - Source: dev.to / 21 days ago
To find fonts we can simply search on the internet, there are a massive amount of services like fontspace, dafont or 1001fonts that are offering free and not free fonts. I suggest you use Google Fonts, that also offeres numerous variants of fonts and simple dashboard to help you find fonts you like. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
Google Fonts is a library of thousands of font families created by Google that you can use in your project for free. Link:- Google Fonts. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
Typst - Focus on your text and let Typst take care of layout and formatting. Join the wait list so you can be part of the beta phase.
Font Squirrel - Font Squirrel scours the internet in search of FREE, highest-quality, designer-friendly, commercial-use fonts and presents them for easy downloading. We don't have the most, but we do have the best.
R Markdown - Dynamic Documents for R
Font Awesome - Font Awesome makes it easy to add vector icons and social logos to your website. And version 5 is redesigned and built from the ground up!
StartPage - Startpage search engine, the new private way to search Google. Protect your Privacy with Startpage!
Dafont - Archive of freely downloadable fonts. Browse by alphabetical listing, by style, by author or by popularity.