Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Raivo OTP VS Azure Multi-Factor Authentication

Compare Raivo OTP VS Azure Multi-Factor Authentication and see what are their differences

ComplyCube
Verify your customers in under 15 seconds anywhere in the world with a cutting-edge SaaS & API platform for Identity Verification and AML/KYC compliance. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Raivo OTP logo Raivo OTP

Raivo OTP is an open-source two-factor authentication app that lets you create a one-time password for your online accounts.

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication logo Azure Multi-Factor Authentication

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication helps safeguard access to data and applications while meeting user demand for a simple sign-in process.
  • Raivo OTP Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-04
  • Azure Multi-Factor Authentication Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-19

Raivo OTP features and specs

  • Open Source
    Raivo OTP is open-source, allowing users to inspect, modify, and contribute to the codebase, promoting transparency and community-driven improvements.
  • Security Focused
    The app emphasizes security, offering features like biometric authentication and encrypted backups to safeguard user data.
  • No Ads
    Raivo OTP does not include advertisements, providing a clean and uninterrupted user experience.
  • Cross-Platform Availability
    Raivo OTP is available on multiple platforms, ensuring that users can access their OTPs across different devices seamlessly.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The application has a simple, intuitive interface, making it easy for users to manage their one-time passwords.

Possible disadvantages of Raivo OTP

  • Limited Built-In Features
    While Raivo OTP covers basic OTP functionalities well, it lacks some advanced features found in competing OTP managers, such as cloud sync.
  • Reliance on Community Contributions
    Being open-source, the app's development and timely updates can depend heavily on community contributions and may not have the same pace as proprietary alternatives.
  • Platform-Specific Limitations
    Certain features might not be available or work the same way across all platforms, depending on the specific technological constraints.
  • Manual Entry Requirement
    Setting up OTPs usually requires manual entry or scanning of QR codes, which might be less convenient compared to automated integrations in other apps.

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication features and specs

  • Enhanced Security
    Azure MFA adds an additional layer of security by requiring users to verify their identity through multiple methods, reducing the risk of unauthorized access.
  • Flexible Authentication Options
    It supports various authentication methods such as phone calls, text messages, app notifications, and hardware tokens, providing flexibility for users.
  • Integration with Microsoft Services
    Seamless integration with other Microsoft services and Azure Active Directory ensures a cohesive security solution across different Microsoft platforms.
  • Compliance Support
    Helps organizations meet compliance requirements by providing an additional layer of security that is often mandated by regulations like GDPR, HIPAA, etc.
  • User-friendly
    Designed to be straightforward for end-users, reducing the friction typically associated with multi-factor authentication processes.
  • Conditional Access Policies
    Enables the configuration of conditional access policies to enforce MFA for specific scenarios, balancing security needs and user convenience.

Possible disadvantages of Azure Multi-Factor Authentication

  • Cost
    While some features are available for free, comprehensive usage of Azure MFA can incur additional costs depending on the Azure AD licensing model.
  • Setup Complexity
    Initial setup and configuration can be complex, especially for organizations without a dedicated IT team.
  • Reliance on Internet Connectivity
    Most verification methods require an internet connection, which can be a drawback in environments with unstable or unreliable internet access.
  • Potential User Resistance
    Some users may find the authentication process cumbersome or may resist changes to the login process, requiring additional user education and support.
  • Dependency on External Devices
    Authentication methods like text messages or app notifications depend on users having access to their mobile devices, which can be problematic if a device is lost or stolen.
  • Integration Challenges with Non-Microsoft Services
    While Azure MFA integrates well with Microsoft services, integration with third-party or non-Microsoft applications may require additional configuration and support.

Raivo OTP videos

No Raivo OTP videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication videos

+ Add

How to register for Azure Multi-Factor Authentication

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Raivo OTP and Azure Multi-Factor Authentication)

Raivo OTP

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication

Password Management
100 100%
Password Management
0% 0
Identity And Access Management
22 22%
Identity And Access Management
78% 78
Two Factor Authentication
10 10%
Two Factor Authentication
90% 90
Security & Privacy
100 100%
Security & Privacy
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Raivo OTP and Azure Multi-Factor Authentication. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Raivo OTP should be more popular than Azure Multi-Factor Authentication. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Raivo OTP mentions (3)

  • Desktop 2FA apps?
    And about a free and open-source 2FA app, I think it's Raivo. I haven’t used it personally but I hear a lot about it. It's available on iOS and macOS, so you can check it out if it works for you. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Twilio, the people who own Authy, got hacked
    It’s not Aegis but it’s open source and well regarded in privacy subreddits. https://github.com/raivo-otp/. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Best TOTP Authenticator for desktop?
    I use personally use Ravio OTP which can send to the desktop using mac receiver once tapped in the mobile app, you also have better control over backups/exports. Source: almost 3 years ago

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication mentions (2)

  • MFA for Outlook Online on cell phone
    This is the answer, more detail: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/authentication/concept-mfa-howitworks. Source: about 3 years ago
  • What do you do if you lost your phone with Microsoft Authenticator?
    Make sure that you back-up the active app-configuration, this way you have an easier way to recover; make sure you are allowed to verify using more than an authenticator, more here. Source: almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Raivo OTP and Azure Multi-Factor Authentication, you can also consider the following products

Aegis Authenticator - Aegis Authenticator is a free, secure and open source app to manage your 2-step verification tokens...

Google Authenticator - Google Authenticator is a multifactor app for mobile devices.

andOTP - andOTP is a two-factor authentication App for Android 4.4+

Authy - Best rated Two-Factor Authentication smartphone app for consumers, simplest 2fa Rest API for developers and a strong authentication platform for the enterprise.

OTP Auth - The app for calculating one-time-passwords on iPhone and iPad.

Duo Security - Duo Security provides cloud-based two-factor authentication. Duo’s technology can be deployed to protect users, data, and applications from breaches, credential theft, and account takeover.

Loading...