Reviewable
Phabricator
Gerrit Code Review
Review Board
Trag
SonarQube
GitHub
BitBucket
Carrd
Linktree
WiX
Webflow
SquareSpace
WordPress
about.me
Bubble.io
Build one-page sites for pretty much anything. Whether it's a personal profile, a landing page to capture emails, or something a bit more elaborate, Carrd has you covered. Simple, responsive, and yup — totally free.
Reviewable CarrdBased on our record, Carrd seems to be a lot more popular than Reviewable. While we know about 218 links to Carrd, we've tracked only 21 mentions of Reviewable. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Reviewable.io — Code review for GitHub repositories, free for public or personal repos. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
Yep, I agree! I work at, and use, Reviewable (https://reviewable.io) and we're the best way to review code on GitHub because we've focused on making the whole process better at every step. We've improved diffing, not only for large files (we support larger files than GitHub does) but also for understanding that diff. Have you ever reviewed a PR twice, but the second time around all your comments are gone and you... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
Https://reviewable.io is the earliest full-powered Critique alternative for GitHub. It supports some cool things Critique doesn't/didn't, such as reviewing multi-commit branches (also across history-rewriting force-push cleanups), and indicating exactly the nature of your comment (just FYI, or you want this to be changed before you'll give your approval). (I was an intern in the initial making of Critique, and... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
The linux kernel, which is open source and does want contributors, is doing more-or-less just fine with an email-based PR and review flow. If it's an open source project, it should be using an open source review platform that allows improvements and specialization of the code hosting too. Using github, where the review tools are bad and can't be improved by an outsider, is a slap in the face to open source.... - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
>See reviewer presence so that you can see if someone is already reviewing and avoid unnecessary pings. >Visibly values privacy and security above all else These two things seem squarely at odds. Personally, I don't want my code review tool announcing to developers when I'm looking at their PR. The fact that it's a Chrome extension would also be a big blocker for me. I run a dev team, and I wouldn't... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
I just through it together with https://carrd.co - I use them for all my quick landing page setups. Source: 7 months ago
Oh atm I have some commissions in queue, but I can attend the draft you need depending of what you want exactly, well, I am open to talk if you are interested, you can contact me by Reddit or my other social media linked to my carrd.co page. Source: 7 months ago
Firstly, sites like carrd.co are NOT "AI tools". They are a basic wizard which generates a simple templated site. Source: 7 months ago
Carrd - One of the easiest platforms to publish anything to web and it's REALLY cheap. Great if you need something similiar. Source: 12 months ago
T.O.S and other details on my carrd.co page <3. Source: 12 months ago
Phabricator - Phacility - Phabricator
Linktree - Connect your audience to all of your content with just one link.
Gerrit Code Review - OpenSource Git Code Review Tool
WiX - Create a free website with Wix.com. Customize with Wix' website builder, no coding skills needed. Choose a design, begin customizing and be online today
Review Board - Stress-free code review for teams of all sizes
Webflow - Build dynamic, responsive websites in your browser. Launch with a click. Or export your squeaky-clean code to host wherever you'd like. Discover the professional website builder made for designers.
