Reviewable VS FontForge

Compare Reviewable VS FontForge and see what are their differences

RealityMAX

RealityMAX is the most powerful free 3D design collaboration platform, 100% online. Cooperate remotely with your colleagues on 3D projects and easily share your work with clients. Create Web3D and AR experiences in a snap, without a line of code. featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

Reviewable

GitHub code review platform.

FontForge

Free (libre) font editor for Windows, Mac OS X and GNU+Linux

Landing page //
2019-01-03

Landing page //
2018-10-14

Reviewable -- what is the fastest way to check out your review code?

FontForge videos

+ Add

FontForge Master Class Part 1 - Install & Intro

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Reviewable and FontForge)

Reviewable

FontForge

Code Collaboration

100 100%

Code Collaboration

0% 0

Design Tools

0 0%

Design Tools

100% 100

Developer Tools

100 100%

Developer Tools

0% 0

Image Marketplace

0 0%

Image Marketplace

100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Reviewable and FontForge. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Reviewable seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 21 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Reviewable mentions (21)

A list of SaaS, PaaS and IaaS offerings that have free tiers of interest to devops and infradev
Reviewable.io — Code review for GitHub repositories, free for public or personal repos. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
The GitHub for Code Review UI Needs Serious Innovation
Yep, I agree! I work at, and use, Reviewable (https://reviewable.io) and we're the best way to review code on GitHub because we've focused on making the whole process better at every step. We've improved diffing, not only for large files (we support larger files than GitHub does) but also for understanding that diff. Have you ever reviewed a PR twice, but the second time around all your comments are gone and you... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
Software Engineering at Google
Https://reviewable.io is the earliest full-powered Critique alternative for GitHub. It supports some cool things Critique doesn't/didn't, such as reviewing multi-commit branches (also across history-rewriting force-push cleanups), and indicating exactly the nature of your comment (just FYI, or you want this to be changed before you'll give your approval). (I was an intern in the initial making of Critique, and... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
Codereview: Should the Go project stop importing GitHub PRs?
The linux kernel, which is open source and does want contributors, is doing more-or-less just fine with an email-based PR and review flow. If it's an open source project, it should be using an open source review platform that allows improvements and specialization of the code hosting too. Using github, where the review tools are bad and can't be improved by an outsider, is a slap in the face to open source.... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Show HN: Visibly – More Collaborative and Efficient Code Reviews on GitHub
>See reviewer presence so that you can see if someone is already reviewing and avoid unnecessary pings. >Visibly values privacy and security above all else These two things seem squarely at odds. Personally, I don't want my code review tool announcing to developers when I'm looking at their PR. The fact that it's a Chrome extension would also be a big blocker for me. I run a dev team, and I wouldn't... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago