Reviewable Reviews

Standard Notes Reviews

Reviewable mentions (21)

• A list of SaaS, PaaS and IaaS offerings that have free tiers of interest to devops and infradev

  Reviewable.io — Code review for GitHub repositories, free for public or personal repos. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago

• The GitHub for Code Review UI Needs Serious Innovation

  Yep, I agree! I work at, and use, Reviewable (https://reviewable.io) and we're the best way to review code on GitHub because we've focused on making the whole process better at every step. We've improved diffing, not only for large files (we support larger files than GitHub does) but also for understanding that diff. Have you ever reviewed a PR twice, but the second time around all your comments are gone and you... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago

• Software Engineering at Google

  Https://reviewable.io is the earliest full-powered Critique alternative for GitHub. It supports some cool things Critique doesn't/didn't, such as reviewing multi-commit branches (also across history-rewriting force-push cleanups), and indicating exactly the nature of your comment (just FYI, or you want this to be changed before you'll give your approval). (I was an intern in the initial making of Critique, and... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago

• Codereview: Should the Go project stop importing GitHub PRs?

  The linux kernel, which is open source and does want contributors, is doing more-or-less just fine with an email-based PR and review flow. If it's an open source project, it should be using an open source review platform that allows improvements and specialization of the code hosting too. Using github, where the review tools are bad and can't be improved by an outsider, is a slap in the face to open source.... - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago

• Show HN: Visibly – More Collaborative and Efficient Code Reviews on GitHub

  >See reviewer presence so that you can see if someone is already reviewing and avoid unnecessary pings. >Visibly values privacy and security above all else These two things seem squarely at odds. Personally, I don't want my code review tool announcing to developers when I'm looking at their PR. The fact that it's a Chrome extension would also be a big blocker for me. I run a dev team, and I wouldn't... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

Standard Notes mentions (128)

• Show HN: Text Lambda, a versatile notebook for your personal data

  This certainly could be useful for me personally, but it would need more functionality. I think the _full_ project could be very useful though. However I would ask, how is this different from e.g. https://standardnotes.com/ and other note systems available ? - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

• A rant: improve your comms Evernote. Oh and bye.

  Standard Notes - Fully Private and Secure with Multiple different Editors and Backup options including Self hosting. Source: 7 months ago

• Evernote will restrict free users to 50 notes starting December 4

  I've been using Standard Notes'[0] free tier for a while now without issues. Far superior to Evernote. And apparently EN uses your data for machine learning so they can monetize their free users. Standard operating procedure. [0] https://standardnotes.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

• ⟳ 4 apps added, 72 updated at f-droid.org

  Standard Notes (version 3.178.0): An end-to-end encrypted note-taking app for digitalists and professionals. Source: 9 months ago

• Beaver Notes: A Privacy-Focused Open-Source Note-Taking App

  - How do I get my data OUT of this thing, if I decide it isn’t right for me? C) If you’re going to go down the “unlike other note-taking platforms” route, it might be valuable to explicitly help people make the comparison in terms of features/approaches/architecture/trade-offs etc. How should one compare this against [Obsidian](https://obsidian.md)? [Simplenote](https://simplenote.com)?... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago