It's interesting that, in light of things like this, you still see large software companies adding support for new components written in non-memory safe languages (e.g. C) As an example Red Hat OpenShift added support for crun(https://github.com/containers/crun), which is written in C as an alternative to runc, which is written in Go( - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago

Yeah, runtimeClass lets you specify which CRI plugin you want based on what you have available. Here's an example from the containerd documentation - you could have one node that can run containers under standard runc, gvisor, kata containers, or WASM. Without runtimeClass, you'd need either some form of custom solution or four differently configured nodes to run those different runtimes. That's how krustlet did... Source: over 1 year ago

Your Docker Container can only run Linux. That's because Docker takes advantage of runC which uses the Linux kernel. You can't run Windows inside of Docker. But of course you can run Docker on a Windows host machine. If you are running a .NET project, you won't be able to use Docker. On the other hand, if you're running .NET Core then you're in luck! - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

This is what Podman, an open-source daemonless and rootless container engine, was developed with in mind. Podman runs using the runC container runtime process, directly on the Linux kernel, and launches containers and pods as child processes. In addition, it was developed for the Docker developer, with most commands and syntax seamlessly mirroring Docker's. Buildah, an image builder, and Skopeo, the image utility... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

If you are curious about how exactly Docker does this I urge to have a look at the following links on layered file system and the library runc and also this great wikipedia overview of Docker. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

Access to test/trial systems: there are trial systems on SAP CAL but not everyone can cough up 150$/month idle + 4$ per hour (S/4HANA 2021 trial with Google Cloud, according to the cost estimator). There are somewhat shady companies in India offering remote access but I know some people even in the US use them because it's way cheaper and convenient. (I don't endorse such companies and don't have any details.). Source: over 1 year ago

One point though: C4C is especially bad with regards to access. With other solutions, SAP is much better. You can spin up an entire SAP cloud infrastructure with S4 and cloud integration on https://cal.sap.com/ and the BTP trials. Source: over 2 years ago

You can easily spin up an S4 system to look around at cal.sap.com. Source: about 3 years ago