Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Sciter VS Electron

Compare Sciter VS Electron and see what are their differences

LibHunt
LibHunt tracks mentions of software libraries on relevant social networks. Based on that data, you can find the most popular projects and their alternatives. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Sciter logo Sciter

Embeddable HTML/CSS/script engine

Electron logo Electron

Build cross platform desktop apps with web technologies
  • Sciter Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-03-11
  • Electron Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-01

Sciter features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Sciter's runtime is very small compared to other frameworks, making applications fast and efficient with low memory consumption.
  • Self-contained
    Sciter is a single DLL with no dependencies required. This simplifies deployment and reduces potential conflicts with other libraries.
  • Good performance
    The framework provides a balance between modern web technologies and high performance by utilizing native C++ code.
  • Cross-platform
    Sciter works on Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and iOS, allowing developers to write applications that run on multiple platforms without additional effort.
  • Rich UI capabilities
    The framework allows the creation of complex and responsive user interfaces using HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.
  • Offline applications
    Sciter does not require a web server as it can run entirely offline, which is beneficial for certain application types.
  • Active development and support
    Sciter is actively maintained and supported, with regular updates and a responsive support system available.

Possible disadvantages of Sciter

  • Limited community
    Sciter has a smaller community compared to more popular frameworks like Electron or Qt, making it harder to find resources or peer support.
  • Proprietary technology
    Sciter is not open-source, which might be a drawback for developers who prefer or require open-source solutions.
  • Documentation
    While improving, some developers may find Sciter's documentation less comprehensive compared to more established frameworks.
  • Learning curve
    Developers familiar with web development will have to adapt to Sciter's specific quirks and methods, which may have a learning curve.
  • Limited integration tools
    Sciter does not have as extensive a range of third-party tools and plugins as more popular frameworks, affecting integration with other systems.

Electron features and specs

  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    Electron allows developers to create applications that run on Windows, macOS, and Linux using a single codebase, making it easier to reach a broader audience.
  • Web Technologies
    Developers can utilize HTML, CSS, and JavaScript (including popular frameworks like React, Angular, and Vue) to build Electron apps, enabling a more accessible development process for web developers.
  • Rich Ecosystem
    Electron benefits from the vast ecosystem of Node.js, granting access to a multitude of packages and modules, and simplifying the inclusion of various functionalities in applications.
  • Auto-Update Mechanism
    Electron has built-in support for auto-updating applications, which saves developers time and effort in managing updates and improves the user experience by keeping the application up-to-date seamlessly.
  • Active Community
    An active community and extensive documentation provide a wealth of resources for developers, from tutorials to plugins, making it easier to find support and improve productivity.

Possible disadvantages of Electron

  • Large File Size
    Because Electron packages both the application code and a version of Chromium, applications tend to be significantly larger in file size compared to native counterparts.
  • High Memory Consumption
    Electron apps can consume more memory because each window runs its instance of Chromium, which can lead to inefficient resource usage, especially on systems with limited memory.
  • Performance
    Due to its reliance on web technologies and Chromium, Electron applications may not perform as well as optimally coded native apps, particularly in resource-intensive scenarios.
  • Security Concerns
    Electron's use of web technologies and features like Node.js integration increases the attack surface, requiring careful handling of security practices to prevent vulnerabilities such as injection attacks.
  • Complexity in Debugging
    Debugging Electron applications can be more complex due to the blend of backend (Node.js) and frontend (browser-like) code, requiring developers to be proficient in multiple debugging tools and techniques.

Sciter videos

No Sciter videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Electron videos

+ Add

💻 Why You Should Build Desktop Software With Electron

More videos:

  • Review - What is Electron: The Hard Parts Made Easy
  • Review - Electron Matrix Review Video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Sciter and Electron)

Sciter

Electron

Development Tools
39 39%
Development Tools
61% 61
Rapid Application Development
39 39%
Rapid Application Development
61% 61
Cross-Platform Development
38 38%
Cross-Platform Development
62% 62
IDE
100 100%
IDE
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Sciter and Electron. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Sciter and Electron

Sciter Reviews

We have no reviews of Sciter yet.
Be the first one to post

Electron Reviews

Electron.js Alternatives For Cross-Platform Development
All of this changed when Electron.js came into the picture. The framework allowed developers to create a unique cross-platform desktop application without any hurdles. However, it uses up quite a bit of resource making it harder for developers to create lightweight applications. With this blog, we will look into suitable alternatives for Electron.js.
Source: www.atatus.com
12 Best Frameworks and Toolkits to Build Desktop Applications
If you are looking for an alternative to the Electronjs desktop application development framework, Neutralinojs is a viable option. A few applications may become bulky with Electron, but Neutralinojs can help avoid such problems.
Source: geekflare.com
10 Best Tools to Develop Cross-Platform Desktop Apps 
Electron.js is compatible with a variety of frameworks, libraries, access to hardware-level APIs and chromium engine, and Node.js support. Electron Fiddle feature is great for experimentation as it allows developers to play around with concepts and templates. Simplification is at the center of Electron because developers don’t have to spend unnecessary time on the packaging,...
Source: www.westagilelabs.com
Electron Alternatives﹣5 Best JavaScript Frameworks for Desktop Apps
If you’re a JavaScript developer, you’re going to need to learn a few relatively simple things on how Electron works and it’s API. You will most probably be able to set up your first Electron desktop application in just a few days.
Source: brainhub.eu
Frameworks & Tools to Develop Cross-Platform Desktop Apps – Best of
Enyo is an open-source JavaScript framework, like Electron, that allows developers to create native-quality apps for desktop, mobile, and TV. Enyo can run across all the relatively modern and standard web-based environments. It’s battle-tested and comes with a beautiful cross-platform UI toolkit for creating rich user interfaces.
Source: www.hongkiat.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Sciter should be more popular than Electron. It has been mentiond 70 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Sciter mentions (70)

  • Servo in 2024: stats, features and donations
    > I'm convinced that using an embedded browser engine to render app UI is the future. Sciter exists: https://sciter.com/ And it indeed is great for UI. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Blitz: A lightweight, modular, extensible web renderer
    I think Sciter is probably the better comparison: https://sciter.com/ It is a ground-up implementation of HTML and CSS rendering. IIRC it used to have its own programming language but now uses JS. I’ve long been interested in this kind of thing but haven’t actually played with Sciter in depth. Used to be that the licensing was a concern but looking at the site now it seems the terms have changed to be much more... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • So You Want to Build a Browser Engine
    Seems a good place to mention https://sciter.com/ It's been on HN loads of times. A "browser" engine but very narrow scope. Works a treat for LOB type apps. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • Show HN: Dropflow, a CSS layout engine for node or <canvas>
    > wondering if css and svg could be used as abstraction over graphics and UI libraries There's another project called Sciter that uses CSS to target native graphics libraries: https://sciter.com > I wonder how hard it was to implement css. I've heard it can be pretty complex. It was hard, but the biggest barrier is the obscurity of the knowledge. Text layout is the hardest, because working with glyphs and... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Bringing Back Horizontal Rules in HTML Select Elements
    [2] https://sciter.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/select-variants.png. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

Electron mentions (14)

  • Design Systems with Web Components
    So we talked a lot about the Atomic Design Principle, but you could just use that in any system and start creating. You could have Angular components, React Components, and Vue Components. But if you notice these don't easily work Everwhere. So the solution is to use Web Components because the modern browser can already understand these, and any Front-End framework can then utilize these components. You can use... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Building Apps with Tauri and Elixir
    For the longest time, building desktop apps was a daunting task to web developers. That is, until technologies like Electron made creating these apps more approachable to a wider audience. Today, we’ve got a wide array of native applications built with solutions like Electron, Tauri, Capacitor, and many more. While these are great solutions, sometimes configuration can be tricky and the applications we create can... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • SvelteKit + Electron: Create your desktop web app
    I make a new Adapter for SvelteKit apps that prerenders your entire site as a collection of static files for use with Electron. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • Electron: Build Desktop Applications Using Plain Javascript
    Electron is a cross-platform shell — a user interface for accessing operating system services both via command line (CLI) and graphical user interface (GUI). - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • Circuit To Turn On Desktop PC
    Electron (https://electronjs.org/) is a framework for developing cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML, and CSS. This is the technology behind many popular apps like Slack, Discord and Visual Studio Code. Join for discussions around Electron! Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Sciter and Electron, you can also consider the following products

Flutter - Build beautiful native apps in record time 🚀

Ultralight - Fast, light HTML UI solution for C++ apps

Qt - Powerful, flexible and easy to use, Qt will help you not only meet your tight deadline, but also reduce the maintainable code by an astonishing percentage.

NeutralinoJS - Neutralino is a lightweight application development framework.

React Native - A framework for building native apps with React

wxWidgets - wxWidgets: Cross-Platform GUI Library

Loading...