No Secureframe videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, dwm seems to be a lot more popular than Secureframe. While we know about 64 links to dwm, we've tracked only 2 mentions of Secureframe. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
My org is in a position where we'll need to get SOC II or ISO 27001 certified in the next year. I've been doing some research on the easiest way to go about this, and discovered secureframe (https://secureframe.com/). It looks like it is a platform that helps you automate/track some of the compliance tasks, but doesn't actually do the audit (they have partners that work through the platform). I'm wondering if... Source: over 1 year ago
Hi, founder of Secureframe (https://secureframe.com) here. Secureframe helps streamline compliance across SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, and more. There are so many accurate responses in this thread. Like many have mentioned, SOC 2 is indeed not a prescriptive framework. Much of the confusion behind SOC 2 stems from that fact. It allows you to customize your InfoSec program to your company's needs. As we know,... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
The only one I can think of the dwm window manager (https://dwm.suckless.org/), that used to prominently mention a SLOC limit of 2000. Doesn't seem to be mentioned in the landing page anymore, not sure if it's still in effect. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
This is sort of the suckless approach. Most (all?) of their projects are customized by editing the source and recompiling. From their window manager, dwm: dwm is customized through editing its source code, which makes it extremely fast and secure - it does not process any input data which isn't known at compile time, except window titles and status text read from the root window's name. You don't have to learn... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
> Their philosophy[1] says nothing of the sort Their philosophy doesn't, but their page for dwm[0] does :D "Because dwm is customized through editing its source code, it's pointless to make binary packages of it. This keeps its userbase small and elitist. No novices asking stupid questions. There are some distributions that provide binary packages though." [0] https://dwm.suckless.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
I was looking for a minimal linux distribution that is light on resources, and I found one called Metis Linux, which is based on Artix. The interesting part of metis is that it wasn't using a desktop environment, but a windows manager called dwm. At the time, metis linux had a minimal bash script installer via chroot. This took longer to setup, but I had a better understanding of what the setup involved rather... - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
The window manager in this screenshot is DWM in floating mode (https://dwm.suckless.org) with a lot of patches and a compositor (to make DWM support transparency). And the terminal is st with some patches. Both should be compiled from source manually. And both are configured in C. Source: about 1 year ago
Vanta - Automate compliance, simplify security.
i3 - A dynamic tiling window manager designed for X11, inspired by wmii, and written in C.
Drata - Put SOC 2 Compliance on Autopilot
awesome - A dynamic window manager for the X Window System developed in the C and Lua programming languages.
Deel - Payroll and compliance for international teams
bspwm - A tiling window manager based on binary space partitioning