Based on our record, Selenium should be more popular than The Acid3 Test. It has been mentiond 8 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
You won't be able to test the javascript function itself from within python, but you can exercise the front-end code using something like cypress (https://cypress.io) or the older but still respectable selenium (https://selenium.dev). Source: over 1 year ago
In addition, .find_element_by_class_name is deprecated since selenium 4.3.0 and the replacement is .find_element(By.CLASS_NAME, "class"). Check selenium's site for more info. Source: over 1 year ago
This is the code again after checking selenium's official site :. Source: over 1 year ago
I also tried the following code seen on the selenium.dev website. Source: over 1 year ago
The following functions are defined within the Selenium project, at revision 1721e627e3b5ab90a06e82df1b088a33a8d11c20. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
Https://shadow.goose.icu/?http://acid3.acidtests.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
During the browser wars, web developers created “Acid Tests” to see how well a browser supported various style sheet and markup conventions. When the acid tests became popular, there were accusations that browser engineers were manipulating their rendering engines to pass those tests. For instance, some cascading style sheet attribute would pass the test, but fail to work as expected under normal use on a web page. Source: over 1 year ago
I am sure that both firefox and chromium-based browsers will pass most of something like ACID3 test. But at this stage standards have nothing to do with reality. Standards define perhaps 10% of the code you are writing and interpretation of the rest 90% of the code is up to the browsers. Source: almost 2 years ago
The old version (http://acid3.acidtests.org/) will reach 97/100 on modern compliant browsers. There is a newer version (https://wpt.live/acid/acid3/test.html) which incorporates the changes made to the specs in the meantime, so modern browsers will reach 100/100 on this one again. The test was carried out against this version, as you can see in the address bar in the screenshot. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
Different PRESENTATION of content on mobile is good. Different content on mobile is the definition of r/assholedesign. It does not matter if the http user agent is a "good" one or not, it should just work. There is a specification, numerous accessibility guidelines, plenty of tests and benchmarks. This isn't 1999 anymore... 🤷♂️. Source: over 2 years ago
Cypress.io - Slow, difficult and unreliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Install Cypress in seconds and take the pain out of front-end testing.
HTML5test - HTML5test is a platform that assigns you a score based on how well your browser follows the requirements of the HTML5 standard.
Robot framework - Robot Framework is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance...
CrossBrowserTesting - Browser Testing made simple! Run automated, visual, and manual tests on 1500+ real browsers and mobile devices. Test more browsers, in less time.
Katalon - Built on the top of Selenium and Appium, Katalon Studio is a free and powerful automated testing tool for web testing, mobile testing, and API testing.
webcheck.me - webcheck.me Free online website scanner. Checks security, seo, performance and mail problems.