No Shottr videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Shottr might be a bit more popular than JSDoc. We know about 68 links to it since March 2021 and only 51 links to JSDoc. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Shottr (https://shottr.cc/) is a great screenshot and annotations app and also includes this feature. Not a promotion, just a very satisfied user of the app; it's quite beautifully designed. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
Highly recommend [shottr](https://shottr.cc). Screenshot replacement with great ways to quickly annotate. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
Shottr has a free version that's very good. Source: 7 months ago
Shottr [0] Screenshot utility for Mac. It's free but it works so well I recently purchased a license for like £6. [0] https://shottr.cc/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
Shottr - Price: Free, with an $8 paid option (one-time purchase) Screenshot and annotation tool for Mac that allows you to capture and edit screenshots with ease. Source: 12 months ago
Thanks to JSDoc it's easy to write documentation that is coupled with your code and can be consumed by users in a variety of formats. When combined with a modern publishing flow like JSR, you can easily create comprehensive documentation for your package that not only fits within your workflow, but also integrates directly in the tools your users consume your package with. This blog post aims to cover best... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
Note: For simplicity, I will omit the JavaScript documentation, but for a production grade code you may want to add the documentation (see jsdoc.app website for more). - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
You may like JSDoc[1] if you just want some type-safety from the IDE without the compilation overhead. It’s done wonders when I’ve had to wrangle poorly commented legacy JavaScript codebases where most of the overhead is tracing what type the input parameters are. Personally, I’m impartial to TypeScript or JSDoc at this point. But I’d rather have either over plain JavaScript. [1] https://jsdoc.app/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
I wholeheartedly agree. At most, I introduce JSDoc[1] to newer developers as standardising how parameters and whatnot are commented at least gets you better documentation and _some_ safety without adding any TS knowledge overhead. [1] https://jsdoc.app/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
The best way to do this, of course, is with JSDoc. But something I always found awkward about jsdoc is defining the object types in the same file. So, after a lot of reading, I found a way to combine JSDoc with declaration type files from Typescript. Let me give you an example:. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
CleanShot X - Capture your Mac’s screen like a PRO ⚡️
Doxygen - Generate documentation from source code
Rectangle - Window management app based on Spectacle, written in Swift.
JSOLint - Format, verify, and lint JSON effortlessly with our powerful Validator Tool. Generate pretty JSON and validate online for free. Simplify your JSON tasks
ShareX - ShareX is a free and open source program that lets you capture or record any area of your screen...
Swagger UI - Swagger UI is a dependency-free collection of HTML, Javascript, and CSS assets that dynamically generate beautiful documentation from a Swag